Abstract
“Regionalism” has been a popular concept in Northeast Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but there is little agreement about what the concept means or how to realize it in practical terms. Detailed examination of what has been happening in relations between the major powers in the region leads Gilbert Rozman of Princeton University to discern three different approaches to regionalism: economic regionalism, great power conflict, and civilizational clashes, each associated to some degree with the reasoning of one of the three major regional powers, Japan, China, and Russia. Economic regionalism is likely to provide most gains for all nations in Northeast Asia in the long term, but in the medium term, more great power and civilizational conflict can be expected.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
