Abstract
We develop the halo model of large-scale structure as an accurate tool for probing primordial non-Gaussianity. In this study we focus on understanding the matter clustering at several redshifts in the context of primordial non-Gaussianity that is a quadratic correction to the local Gaussian potential, characterized by the parameter ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$. In our formulation of the halo model we pay special attention to the effect of halo exclusion and show that this can potentially solve the long-standing problem of excess power on large scales in this model. The halo model depends on the mass function, clustering of halo centers, and the density profiles. We test these ingredients using a large ensemble of high-resolution Gaussian and non-Gaussian numerical simulations, covering ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}={0,+100,\ensuremath{-}100}$. In particular, we provide a first exploration of how halo density profiles change in the presence of primordial non-Gaussianity. We find that for ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ positive (negative) high-mass haloes have an increased (decreased) core density, so being more (less) concentrated than in the Gaussian case. We also examine the halo bias and show that, if the halo model is correct, then there is a small asymmetry in the scale dependence of the bias on very large scales, which arises because the Gaussian bias must be renormalized. We show that the matter power spectrum is modified by $\ensuremath{\sim}2.5%$ and $\ensuremath{\sim}3.5%$ on scales $k\ensuremath{\sim}1.0\text{ }h\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at $z=0$ and $z=1$, respectively. Our halo model calculation reproduces the absolute amplitude to within $\ensuremath{\lesssim}10%$ and the ratio of non-Gaussian to Gaussian spectra to within $\ensuremath{\lesssim}1%$. We also measure the matter correlation function and find similarly good levels of agreement between the halo model and the data. We anticipate that this modeling will be useful for constraining ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ from measurements of the shear correlation function in future weak lensing surveys such as Euclid.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.