Abstract

In recent years, the study of the evolution of non-compliant behaviour in public procurement has been widely developed due to the growing economic relevance of this phenomenon. When such a question is formalized in terms of a dynamical model, new insights can be pursued, related to the possible evolution from a situation with low dishonesty level to high dishonesty level or vice versa. The present model considers an evolutionary adaptation process explaining whether honest or dishonest behaviour prevails in society at any given time by assuming endogenous monitoring by the State. We will distinguish between a scenario in which firms converge to monomorphic configurations (all honest or all dishonest) and a scenario in which firms converge to polymorphic compositions (that is with coexistence of both groups), depending on the relevant parameters. By making use of both analytical tools and numerical simulations, the present work aims at explaining the effectiveness of economic policies to reduce or eliminate non-compliant behaviour. Social stigma is found to play a key role: if the “inner attitude toward honesty” of a country is not strong enough, then dishonesty cannot be ruled out. However, increasing both the fine level attached to dishonest behaviour and the monitoring effort by the State can reduce asymptotic dishonesty levels and escape form the dishonesty trap.

Highlights

  • Beccaria (1764) and Bentham (1789) were among the first authors to begin studying crime and criminal response in a rational way focusing on the scientific approach to criminology research

  • By following this research line, we assume an endogenous monitoring technology, which depends on the diffusion of corruptive behaviour in society, in order to show how the endogenous audit level has an effect on equilibrium and evolution in the public procurement sector when considering non-compliant behaviours

  • Our analysis shows that having a high level of “inner honesty" is a necessary and sufficient condition for the system to converge towards a society in which all firms are honest

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Beccaria (1764) and Bentham (1789) were among the first authors to begin studying crime and criminal response in a rational way focusing on the scientific approach to criminology research. By following this research line, we assume an endogenous monitoring technology, which depends on the diffusion of corruptive behaviour in society, in order to show how the endogenous audit level has an effect on equilibrium and evolution in the public procurement sector when considering non-compliant behaviours. Higher intrinsic honesty derives from the fact that a greater social stigma is attributed to dishonest behaviour (as it emerges from the paper by Fisman and Miguel (2007), in which the importance of considering the “culture of legality” of a country is highlighted) This intrinsic honesty of the country is a variable on which a State can act but only in the medium–long term. The transitions to different long term qualitative scenarios can be explained by considering modifications in some key ingredients of the model (such as honesty propensity, fine level, social stigma, effort put in place by the State to fight dishonest behaviour, etc.) and the related parameters (i.e. bifurcation analysis is presented).

Economic set-up
The evolution of non-compliant behaviour
Endogenous monitoring level
The final system
Equilibria and long-run dynamics
Low fine and simple dynamics
High fine and complex dynamics
Findings
Conclusions and further developments
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call