Abstract
In the present study the numerical modelling aspects of unsteady flow in simple and compound channels are examined through the application to a laboratory data set of the simple hydrologic routing method Muskingum and the unsteady flow dynamic routing models EXTRAN and ONE-D. Model simulations were compared and evaluated by applying various statistical measures to determine the degree of goodness-of-fit between simulated and observed hydrographs. In terms of overall performance, the Muskingum method proved to be a simple and reliable method avoiding complicated mathematical and numerical computations for the cases considered.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
