Abstract
Abstract Background: The analysis of information generated from experiments involving different treatments, can be done by multivariate statistical analysis techniques, such as discriminant analysis, to analyze data obtained from predefined groups. Objective: Verify, through discriminant analysis, the differences among cover crop (Avena strigosa, Chenopodium quinoa, Cichorium intybus, and fallow land) treatments with respect to main crop soybean yield. Methods: For weed control, these cover crops were subjected to different management techniques, namely mowing, the application of glyphosate or the application of paraquat. The experimental design consisted of completely randomized blocks in a 4 × 3 × 2 factorial scheme, with four replications, consisting of the following factors: Factor A: (treatment) cover crops of A. strigosa, C. quinoa, C. intybus, and fallow land; Factor B: (management) plots were subdivided and treated with the application of paraquat or glyphosate, or the mowing of cover plants; Factor C: the plots were sub-subdivided and managed by one or two applications of a post-emergence herbicide. In order to evaluate the percentage of correct classifications of the different management techniques and treatments, a data matrix was elaborated for evaluation of variables relating to the soybean crop and the data were standardized by log - log 10 - log (n; 10). Multivariate analysis was performed using Fisher's linear discriminant method. Results: Discriminant analysis selected four variables with discriminatory power relating to the A. strigosa, C. quinoa, C. intybus and fallow, which contributed to 100% of the explained variance. Conclusions: Treatment with oats used as a cover crop provided higher soybean crop yield, whereas in terms of management, weed control using glyphosate provided the best results with all cover crops.
Highlights
Brazil has a long history of soybean production, and data indicate that the average yields of soybean crops increased from 1,748 kg ha-1 to 3,206 kg ha-1 during the period from 1976/1977 to 2018/2019 (Conab, 2020)
In no-tillage systems, the use of soil cover crops can contribute to reducing weed growth and providing conditions conducive to the development of the main crop
In order to perpetuate this evolutionary process, continuous studies are necessary to evaluate new varieties and species of cover crop plants that can contribute to realizing maximum productive potential and thereby benefit the main crop, either by improving soil conditions or with respect to weed control
Summary
Brazil has a long history of soybean production, and data indicate that the average yields of soybean crops increased from 1,748 kg ha-1 to 3,206 kg ha-1 during the period from 1976/1977 to 2018/2019 (Conab, 2020) This increase in productivity can be attributed to several factors, including genetic improvement, alteration in planting systems (conventional to notillage), soil management and conservation, and pest, disease, and weed control technologies (Domingos et al, 2015). Among the different types of agricultural management, weed control is one of the most important technologies adopted to ensure satisfactory crop development In this regard, in no-tillage systems, the use of soil cover crops can contribute to reducing weed growth and providing conditions conducive to the development of the main crop. Conclusions: Treatment with oats used as a cover crop provided higher soybean crop yield, whereas in terms of management, weed control using glyphosate provided the best results with all cover crops
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
