Abstract

This paper presents the predictive functional control of an autoclave, which is designed, tested and compared in uni- and multivariable manners. The control of the autoclave is based on our previously developed mathematical model for an autoclave, where we dealt with the heat-transfer and pressure-changing processes. First, we presented the principles of the predictive control algorithm, which are easy to understand. Next, the basic principles of predictive control were extended to a multivariable manner, so we presented the control law of the multivariable predictive algorithm. Furthermore, we depicted the suggested tuning rules for both control algorithms, which normally give satisfactory results, considering the trade-off between robustness and performance. We implemented both predictive algorithms in the linearized and simplified autoclave model, where we applied faster tuning rules due to the need for faster closed-loop responses. For the comparison we also designed and applied a classical compensating PI controller. The results show the superior performance of the multivariable predictive approach. All three algorithms rise similarly quickly, but then the PI and the simple predictive controller slowly approach the desired value due to slower tuning, because of the very noisy manipulated variable. The interactions in the autoclave model are not so strong, so by the interactions influence rejection, both predictive algorithms show similar performances, while the PI approach performs much worse. The multivariable predictive approach also proves its superior performance by the interactions influence rejection when controlling the processes with stronger interactions. We can conclude that the autoclave should be controlled as one multivariable process using a multivariable predictive functional approach.

Highlights

  • The control of the autoclave is designed on the basis of a mathematical model of the autoclave developed in [1], where the paper deals with the various types of heat transfer, basic heat-transfer equations, heattransfer coefficients, heat flow, forced convection, conduction, thermal resistance, specific theories about dimensionless numbers like the Nusselt, Reynolds and Prandtl numbers, etc

  • It is clear that the manipulated variable of the multivariable predictive functional control (MPFC) algorithm holds a little longer at the high/low limit, which explains reaching the desired temperature more quickly

  • The main advantage of the proposed MPFC algorithm is in the simple design, even in the case of delayed systems

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The control of the autoclave is designed on the basis of a mathematical model of the autoclave developed in [1], where the paper deals with the various types of heat transfer, basic heat-transfer equations, heattransfer coefficients, heat flow, forced convection, conduction, thermal resistance, specific theories about dimensionless numbers like the Nusselt, Reynolds and Prandtl numbers, etc. The focus is the process inside the autoclave, which can be more described as heating, cooling and changing the pressure. The temperature is controlled continuously with two predictive functional controllers (PFCs) and pulse-width modulation of the heating with electrical heaters and cooling with a water cooler and an analogue valve. In the paper the predictive functional control of an autoclave in uni- (PFC) and multivariable (MPFC) manners is presented. The performances of both predictive algorithms are compared to the classical compensating PI approach. The mathematical model of the autoclave’s cooling is again built using heat flows and energy-balance equations, where similar parameters and coefficients are defined. Some of the model parameters were first estimated and optimized with the method of the model’s response fitting to the measured data with the criterion function of the sum of squared errors, described with symbols as follows:

DETAILS OF THE AUTOCLAVE MODEL
PREDICTIVE FUNCTIONAL CONTROL
MULTIVARIABLE PREDICTIVE FUNCTIONAL CONTROL
CONTROLLER TUNING RULES
IMPLEMENTATION
RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.