Abstract

This article investigates whether goal-directed learning of pictures leads to multiple mental representations which are differently useful for different purposes. The paper further investigates the effects of prompts on picture processing. 136 undergraduate students were presented maps of a fictitious city. One half of the participants were instructed to learn their map as preparation to draw it from memory as precisely as possible (PrepDraw), which should stimulate the creation of an elaborated surface representation. The other half were instructed to learn the map as preparation for finding the shortest traffic connection from various locations to other locations (PrepConnect), which should stimulate the construction of a task-oriented deep-structure representation (mental model). Within both experimental groups, one-third of the participants received the map without prompts. Another third received the map with survey prompts (stimulating processing of what is where), and the final third received the map with connect prompts (stimulating processing of how train stations are connected). In the following test phase, participants received a recognition task, a recall task, and an inference task. For recognition and recall, two surface structure scores (extent, accuracy) and two deep structure scores (extent, accuracy) were calculated. The inference task served also to indicate deep structure accuracy. The PrepDraw group outperformed the PrepConnect group in terms of surface structure related variables, whereas the PrepConnect group outperformed the PrepDraw group in terms of deep structure-related variables. Map processing was not enhanced by prompts aligned with the instruction, but non-aligned prompts tended to interfere with learning.

Highlights

  • Abundant research has demonstrated that students learn better from text and pictures than from text alone (Ainsworth, 2014; Butcher, 2006; Carney & Levin, 2002; Johnson & Mayer, 2012; Mayer, 1997, 2009, 2014)

  • The research presented in this paper aimed at answering the following questions: (1) Do learners trying to understand a picture construct multiple mental representations in their mind? do they create a perceptual representation of the picture’s surface structure as well as a mental model of the task-oriented deep structure and put different emphasis on the elaboration of these representations depending on the anticipating tasks or learning goals?

  • The present study was based on the assumption that picture processing is a goal directed strategic process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Abundant research has demonstrated that students learn better from text and pictures than from text alone (Ainsworth, 2014; Butcher, 2006; Carney & Levin, 2002; Johnson & Mayer, 2012; Mayer, 1997, 2009, 2014) Previous research on learning from text and pictures resulted in theories assuming fundamentally different mental representations for text comprehension and for picture comprehension. Two codes are assumed to be better than only one code which would explain the superior memory for pictures compared to words. This view has become untenable, since it became obvious that text processing leads to multiple codes (Kintsch, 1998; van Dijk & Kintsch, 1983)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.