Abstract

Regulators increasingly pressure companies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the case of many large corporations, most emissions originate from supply chain operations. Consequently, firms often pass on external pressures to their suppliers by requesting them to implement low-carbon initiatives. While existing research suggests that external pressures from both regulators and customers are mostly effective in motivating environmental action among suppliers, it remains unexplored how organizational perception of risks and opportunities influences this relationship. The purpose of this paper is to examine empirically how the perception of climate change-related risks and opportunities moderates the influence of external pressures on a supplier’s decision to adopt low-carbon supply chain management (LCSCM) practices. The sample consists of 877 companies from 37 countries that supply to large multinational enterprises. Secondary data is sourced from CDP’s Supply Chain Program and other databases and statistically analyzed using binary logistic regression models. The results show that a supplier’s decision to implement LCSCM practices is mainly determined by customer requests to reduce GHG emissions and the stringency and effectiveness of climate change policies in its home country. Contrary to theoretical predictions, little empirical evidence is provided for a moderating influence of perceived climate-related risks and opportunities. However, in most cases a company’s perception of both risks and opportunities is directly and positively related to LCSCM. Firm size is also found to be influential, while profitability, an industry’s GHG intensity, a country’s economic development and the private sector’s responsiveness to environmental issues do not significantly affect suppliers’ behavior.

Highlights

  • Due to the need for action on climate change, companies are increasingly under pressure to adopt appropriate response measures (Hill, 2001)

  • Our study contributes to the emerging literature that addresses the question of whether pressures from customers and regulators represent a driver for implementing low-carbon supply chain management (LCSCM) practices and how organizational factors influence this relationship

  • Our findings connect to previous studies that examined the role of external pressures for environmental action in the supply chain (SC) (e.g., Delmas and Montiel, 2009; Jira and Toffel, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the need for action on climate change, companies are increasingly under pressure to adopt appropriate response measures (Hill, 2001). Several authors have suggested that empirical research should focus more on the interplay between external and internal factors of GSCM adoption to reveal potential moderation effects (Kumar et al, 2014). In this regard, Sarkis et al (2011) argue that scholars should address the following two research questions: (1) How do “external and internal factors interactively promote GSCM practices?”, and (2) “Why do heterogeneous responses to GSCM implementation from institutional pressures exist?”

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call