Abstract
For the inherent characteristics of a raw streamflow times series and the complicated relationship between multi-scale predictors and streamflow, monthly streamflow forecasting is very difficult. In this paper, an method was proposed integrating the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) with deep belief networks (DBN) for forecasting monthly streamflow time series, which is EEMD-Lasso-DBN (ELD) method. To develop the ELD model, the raw streamflow time series was resolved into different elements, including intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and residue series, using the EEMD technique. The predictors of each IMF element and residue were screened using the Lasso technique from a large number of candidate predictors, respectively. Then, the DBN models were built to simulate the complex relationship between the resolved elements and the selected predictors, respectively. The predicted results of the IMFs and residual series were assembled as an ensemble forecast for the raw streamflow time series and were compared with the other models. The monthly streamflow series from Tennessee, in the USA, were investigated using the ELD method. It was found that each IMF has different characteristics and physical meaning, corresponding to different predictors. The proposed ELD model can significantly improve the accuracy of monthly streamflow forecasting.
Highlights
Streamflow forecasting is essential for water resources’ planning and management, such as dam construction, reservoir operation, and flood control [1,2]
The primary objective of this paper is to propose a new data-driven approach from predictors screening to streamflow forecasting, which integrates the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD), and deep belief networks (DBN)
This study aimed to develop a new approach based on EEMD, Lasso, and DBN for improving the accuracy of streamflow forecasting
Summary
Streamflow forecasting is essential for water resources’ planning and management, such as dam construction, reservoir operation, and flood control [1,2]. Streamflow forecasting is difficult because there are non-stationary characteristics of the raw monthly streamflow time series for intrinsic characteristics, a complex relationship between the impact predictors and monthly streamflow for an external environment, and multi-scale impact predictors, including atmospheric oscillations, sea surface temperatures, and precipitation. This influence has the characteristics of uncertainty, temporal and spatial variation at different scales, and time-invariance, i.e., it may be different in different seasons [3,4].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.