Abstract
Simple SummaryThe house mouse is a very common pest in low-income multi-family residential dwellings. They cause significant property damage and produce allergens that are linked to asthma and allergy. Current mouse management practices in these dwellings are not effective. This study attempted to gain insights into residents’ impressions of house mice, develop more effective mouse detection methods, and evaluate the effectiveness of building-wide mouse management programs. The programs were implemented by researchers for 63 days and the results were monitored for up to 12 months. Significant differences were found in the efficacy of two commercial blank baits for detecting house mouse activity. Chocolate spread was significantly more effective than both commercial blank baits for detecting house mice. Between the two commercial toxic rodent baits tested, FirstStrike® (0.0025% difethialone) was more palatable than Contrac® (0.005% bromadiolone) rodent bait. A building-wide mouse control program resulted in an 87% reduction in mouse activity after three months in two buildings. After 12 months, the number of infestations decreased by 94% in one building, but increased by 26% in another building. Long-term house mouse control requires continuous efforts and the incorporation of multiple strategies.The house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, is a common pest in multi-family residential apartment buildings. This study was designed to gain insights into residents’ impressions of house mice, develop more effective house mouse detection methods, and evaluate the effectiveness of building-wide house mouse management programs. Two high-rise apartment buildings in New Jersey were selected for this study during 2019–2020. Bait stations with three different non-toxic baits were used to detect house mouse activity. Two rodenticides (FirstStrike®—0.0025% difethialone and Contrac®—0.005% bromadiolone) were applied by researchers over a 63-day period and pest control operations were then returned to pest control contractors for rodent management. There were significant differences in the consumption rates of non-toxic baits and two toxic baits tested. A novel non-toxic bait, chocolate spread, was much more sensitive than the two commercial non-toxic baits for detecting mouse activity. The house mouse management programs resulted in an average 87% reduction in the number of infested apartments after three months. At 12 months, the number of infestations decreased by 94% in one building, but increased by 26% in the second building. Sustainable control of house mouse infestations requires the use of effective monitoring strategies and control programs coupled with preventative measures.
Highlights
The house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz and Schwarz (Rodentia: Muridae), is a cosmopolitan rodent species
Effective rodenticides and trapping devices are available, mice remain a difficult pest to manage in multi-family dwellings (MFDs)
This study exemplifies the importance of a proactive rodent management program based on integrated pest management program (IPM) necessary to succeed in long-term building-wide elimination of house mouse infestations in MFDs
Summary
The house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz and Schwarz (Rodentia: Muridae), is a cosmopolitan rodent species. In the U.S, it is one of the most common indoor pests with significant public health implications [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The success of the house mouse is largely attributed to their ability to live in close association with humans [7]. Effective rodenticides and trapping devices are available, mice remain a difficult pest to manage in multi-family dwellings (MFDs). Among 1363 persons surveyed in Baltimore, 49% of the respondents observed mice in their residences [8]. In Gary, Indiana, 36% of the surveyed apartments were infested [9]. In an urban housing community in Manchester, United
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have