Abstract

This article deals with the question of demilitarization and neutralization of the ?land Islands in respect to international law regulating this issue. In this paper it was not intented to go into details of all historical phases and changes of the ?land's status, but rather to concentrate on international treaties regulating this question, which are still in force. ?land is an autonomous, demilitarized and neutralized region of Finland with a largely Swedish-speaking population. The ?land Islands form an archipelago in the Baltic Sea. They are situated in the entrance to the Gulf of Bothnia. Its legislative autonomy and a strong protection for its population's Swedish language and culture are enshrined in the Finnish constitution. The ?land Islands are located in a very strategically important place. There are three problems under international law connected with the ?land Islands: that is to say, demilitarization, neutralization and autonomy of ?land. After the Crimean war it was decided that Russia should not fortify the ?land Islands. The strategic position was one of the factors that influenced the decision of the Paris Peace Conference in 1856 to demilitarize the ?land Islands. After the Crimean War (1854-56) an appendix to the 1856 Treaty of Paris forbade Russia from establishing fortifications, maintaining or building up a military presence and naval forces on the islands. In 1917 Finland gained independence from Russia and ?land became for a number of years a source of controversy or even conflict between Finland and Sweden as a result of the ?landers' demand for ?land's reunification with Sweden. In 1921 the League of Nations resolved the ?land question. ?land remained a part of Finland but gained autonomy along with the historically rooted principles of neutrality and demilitarization. In October 1921 the Convention relating to the non-fortification and Neutralization of the ?land Islands was signed by Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The Western powers did not regard Bolshevik Russia as a sovereign state after the revolution of 1917 and Russia (the Soviet Union) was not a party to this convention. The treaties that regulatedthe demilitarization and neutralization were: 1) the 1856 Convention on the Demilitarisation of the ?land Islands (annexed to the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty), 2) the 1921 Convention on the Demilitarization and Neutralization of the ?land Islands, 3) bilateral treaty of 1940 between Finland and Russia (the Soviet Union) on the demilitarization of the ?land Islands and 4) the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty. There is no cause to doubt the continuance in force of the demilitarization and neutralization of ?land. The treaties and agreements of 1921,1940 and 1947 are still in force. ?land's demilitarization and neutralization remain beyond question, despite the changes in the political context. The ?land Islands are both demilitarized and neutralized, the main purpose is to keep it completely outside the armed actions of armed conflicts. ?land's status received renewed attention in the 1990s in view of the changes taking place in Europe. The 1994 treaty on Finland's accession to the EU recognizes in its Protocol No. 2, that the ?land Islands enjoy a special status under international law. Furthermore, another legal regulation dealing with this question is the Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Convention on the protection of war victims (Article 60) obligates States Parties to respect demilitarized zones during international armed conflicts. ?land's demilitarized and neutralized status has a strong foundation and position in the international law. Some experts and writers have described this status as a example of a "permanent settlement" or "objective regime" in international law. According to another experts (H. Rotkirch), the special status of the ?land Islands is of such long standing " that it has without doubt become part of customary international law and is thus binding on the international community as a whole". Since 1970, ?land has had its own representation in the Nordic Council and participates in the work of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Since 1989, ?land is a member of the Council of Europe. One might also mention the fact that, ?land stands outside the EU tax union and has retained the limitations on ownership of land and operation of business.

Highlights

  • Należące do Finlandii Wyspy Alandzkie stanowią archipelag 6000 wysp położonych w środkowej części Morza Bałtyckiego między wybrzeżem Szwecji i Finlandii (w połowie drogi morskiej pomiędzy Sztokholmem a Helsinkami) u wejścia do Zatoki Botnickiej

  • Wynik negocjacji odebrany został jako sukces Alandczyków, a o cjalne uznanie w Protokole Alandzkim szczególnego statusu Alandów w prawie międzynarodowym w istocie potwierdziło autonomiczny, zdemilitaryzowany oraz zneutralizowany charakter prowincji na arenie międzynarodowej

  • 4 Aktu Autonomii stwierdza również, iż rząd Wysp Alandzkich może kontaktować się z Komisją Unii Europejskiej w sprawach leżących w kompetencjach autonomii i związanych z implementacją decyzji Unii Europejskiej na Wyspach

Read more

Summary

Michał Jan Filipek

Z archipelagiem Wysp Alandzkich związane są trzy zagadnienia z zakresu prawa międzynarodowego oraz stosunków międzynarodowych: kwestia autonomii, demilitaryzacji oraz neutralizacji regionu archipelagu. Wyspy Alandzkie posiadają status autonomii regulowany zarówno przez akty prawa międzynarodowego, jak również wewnętrzne ustawodawstwo Republiki Finlandii. Zagadnienie neutralizacji oraz demilitaryzacji archipelagu Wysp Alandzkich nie doczekało się do tej pory wyczerpującego opracowania w polskim piśmiennictwie prawniczo-naukowym. Kilku autorów[30] wskazywało na potwierdzenie międzynarodowego statusu Alandów poprzez konstruowane przez prawo międzynarodowe instytucje permanent settlement oraz objective regime, które – nakładając zobowiązania na państwa – uznają tym samym, że pewien stan faktyczny stał się już prawem zwyczajowym w europejskim systemie prawa[31]. Jeżeli umowa międzynarodowa zawarta przez Finlandię jest sprzeczna z Aktem Autonomii Wysp Alandzkich, to umowa ta nie wchodzi w życie na terenie Alandów. Jasnym dla Alandczyków stał się fakt konieczności prowadzenia negocjacji celem uzyskania szczególnej, uprzywilejowanej pozycji pozwalającej na utrzymanie alandzkiego prawa do domicylu

Alandy na drodze do Unii Europejskiej
Wyspy Alandzkie we Wspólnocie
Sprawy unijne w parlamencie alandzkim

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.