Abstract
Abstract Methods for the validation of reported pH values are developed for incomplete precipitation chemistry data sets. The most stringent tests are based on a comparison between the net strong acidity calculated from the the conservative inorganic cations and anions and that determined from the measured pH. The strong acidity of a sample in equilibrium with atmospheric carbon dioxide can be determined from an accurate pH measurement. Less severe tests are based on charge and conductivity balances. The proposed methods are applied to Texas precipitation chemistry data to identify unreliable measurements and to determine the spatial distribution of the mean pH for validated data. Reported mean pH values, especially those of pH > 5, are lower than can be validated. For data sets with a complete analysis of the major ionic species, the comparison of net acidities is generally a stronger quality assurance test for the validation of pH measurements than the charge balance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Environmental Science and Health . Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.