Abstract

The technical world of today fundamentally relies on structural analysis in the form of design and structural mechanic simulations. A traditional and robust simulation method is the physics-based finite element method (FEM) simulation. FEM simulations in structural mechanics are known to be very accurate; however, the higher the desired resolution, the more computational effort is required. Surrogate modeling provides a robust approach to address this drawback. Nonetheless, finding the right surrogate model and its hyperparameters for a specific use case is not a straightforward process. In this paper, we discuss and compare several classes of mesh-free surrogate models based on traditional and thriving machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods. We show that relatively simple algorithms (such as k-nearest neighbor regression) can be competitive in applications with low geometrical complexity and extrapolation requirements. With respect to tasks exhibiting higher geometric complexity, our results show that recent DL methods at the forefront of literature (such as physics-informed neural networks) are complicated to train and to parameterize and thus, require further research before they can be put to practical use. In contrast, we show that already well-researched DL methods, such as the multi-layer perceptron, are superior with respect to interpolation use cases and can be easily trained with available tools. With our work, we thus present a basis for the selection and practical implementation of surrogate models.

Highlights

  • We pave the way of mesh-free surrogate modeling for practical use: we provide a basis for efficient model and hyperparameters selection regarding use case and performance metrics

  • Our multilayer perceptron (MLP) were designed to be similar to our physics informed neural networks (PINNs) to allow for fair comparisons

  • All classes of surrogate models that we considered in this work share several key characteristics: (1) they are mesh-free and can deliver results with infinite resolution; (2) the computation time required to obtain the target values at predefined positions is orders of magnitude lower than for finite element method (FEM) simulations; (3) since for each simulation setup, where the geometry changes, a different mesh is created during FEM simulations, our results indicate that all classes of surrogate models generalize reasonably well across training data positions; (4) all surrogate model classes generalize at least to some extent across use case parameters, such as changes in geometry or material parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An essential simulation method is the finite element method (FEM) in which the simulation domain space is represented by a finite number of connected elements

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.