Abstract
Nanomedicine: Does this term more than pseudo-scientific “pink of fashio”, at least potentially? From a classical point of view, the goal of nanomedicine is the creation of nanoscale autonomous technical devices (nanobots), programmed to perform diagnostic and/or therapeutic manipulation in a living organism: the destruction of malignant cells, destruction of atherosclerotic plaques, and so on. The main advocate is a point of view (technocratic) on the subject of nanomedicine which is controversial, and its feasibility is questionable. Furthermore, most importantly, the question arises – WHY develop and create wonders of engineering – technical nanoscale devices for correction of the condition of the body, if they have already devised and are effectively being used by biological systems? Does it make sense to reinvent the wheel if it has already been invented and produced by nature, even if called differently? Is it not better, instead of inventing another bike, to focus efforts and resources on understanding the principles of functioning of the natural nanodevices, as well as practicing ways to improve efficiency (optimization) of their functioning in vivo ? Key words : Nanomedicine, Biomolecules, Technic deviced, Auto-antibodies, Health state, Diagnostic, Correction
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
