Abstract

In the context of transformation of all spheres of life, the ability of people to effectively communicate and resolve conflicts that arise throughout life is of great importance. The congestion of courts, the length and high cost, inflexibility and regularity of the judicial way of resolving conflicts in civil, family, labor and other areas of law make it necessary to resort to alternative approaches to dispute resolution (ADR). Of particular importance is the ability to use mediation procedures – an informal and flexible dispute resolution process. Mediation is free from the disadvantages of litigation: the European experience shows that the basic principles of mediation are voluntariness, autonomy of the parties, confidentiality of the procedure, the neutrality of the mediator, unlike a judge or lawyer. The actual application of these principles and rules of mediation allows for excellent results in conflict resolution - the practice of EU countries and associated members indicates that between 80% and 100% of cases are resolved through mediation.
 The article discusses in detail the experience of EU Member States in applying mediation practices: models of keeping a register of mediators (registering is possible by a single state body, more often it is the Ministry of Justice; registers can be maintained by a single non-governmental organization, for example, mediators' associations of a country; which unites mediators and each is responsible for its own register), the requirements for the qualification and professional level of mediators (usually any person without restrictions on the profession can become a mediator; but often the age criterion is used), the regulatory framework for mediation (mainly mediation is governed by the relevant country law, but also the approach without legislative regulation of mediation procedures, for example, in the Netherlands), the cost of mediation procedures (mainly depends on the complexity of the conflict case and the field of the case). The role of mediation in resolving labor disputes is considered: models of application of mediation in companies, issues of organization losses in the event of conflicts and their improper resolution, directions of improvement of the system of conflict management in organizations taking into account the European experience.

Highlights

  • Олена ПАРХОМЕНКО* кандидат економічних наук, доцент кафедри управління та адміністрування, Харківський національний університет імені В.Н

  • У статті докладно розглядається досвід країн-членів Європейського Союзу у застосуванні практики медіації: моделі ведення реєстрів медіаторів, вимоги до кваліфікації та професійного рівня посередників, регулятивні засади медіації (в основному медіація регулюється відповідним законом країни, але також використовується підхід без законодавчого регулювання медіаційних процедур, наприклад, у Нідерландах), вартість медіаційних процедур (в основному залежить від складності конфліктного випадку та сфери права)

  • MEDIATION AS A COMPONENT OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN UKRAINE

Read more

Summary

CPP Global Human Capital Report

Workplace Conflict And How Businesses Can Harness It To Thrive. The cost of conflict in the workplace.

Italy’s Mediation Law
10. Mediatorsfederatie
16. Медіація: альтернативний чи ефективний спосіб вирішення спорів?
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.