Abstract

Article discusses the use of the Maintenance error decision aid (MEDA) methodology in the investigation of events and subsequent data collection and assessment which is needed for the collection and evaluation of safety indicators. The first part describes the methodology of MEDA, the second outlines the use of factors for the purposes of collecting safety indicators and evaluation of the safety performance of the organization in terms of implementation of risk factors contributing to the realization of unwanted events.

Highlights

  • Safety evaluation in terms of safety performance is recently more and more popular

  • Using the procedure described above using investigation methodology methodology error of decision aid (MEDA) it is evident that the collection of particular events factors, we have a statistical summary of the number of each factor occurrences

  • If we go more in depth and various indicators will be linked with the realization of senior events, we discover their contribution to the realization - their seriousness

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Safety evaluation in terms of safety performance is recently more and more popular At first it was a unique attempt by operators to find and learn from the mistakes that occur during normal activities in everyday processes. This effort is transformed into legislative requirements. One of the developed tools is Boeing's Maintenance methodology error of decision aid (MEDA). This methodology deals with the progress in the investigation of event incurred in the maintenance of aircraft and aims to identify the causes of such events. Methodology MEDA provides a detailed description of the groups of factors influencing the realization of the event

MEDA METHODOLOGY AND ITS USAGE
USING THE MEDA METHODOLOGY AS AN INSTRUMENT
INDICATORS EVALUATING
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call