Abstract

Rate constants for the reaction of the title compound, 1, with a number of oxygen nucleophiles, including structurally related phenoxides and oxygen-based α-nucleophiles, have been measured in aqueous solution at 25 °C. A significant α-effect was observed, confirming participation of the nucleophile in the rate-limiting step of the reaction as well as indicating different transition states (TS) for the reaction of α-nucleophiles compared to normal ones. The Bronsted-type correlation of log kNuvs. pKa of nucleophiles shows a linear plot for the series of structurally related phenoxides in the pKa range 5.4–10.0, straddling the pKa of the leaving group (3-methyl-4-nitrophenoxide, pKa 7.20), but is curved in the highly basic region corresponding to CF3CH2O− and HO− as nucleophiles. The slope of the linear portion of the plot (βNu) is 0.49 (R2 0.988). The linearity of the plot for the series of structurally related phenoxides is consistent with a concerted mechanism for nucleophilic attack at the P center of the substrate. A value of βlg −0.39 (R2 0.973) is measured for the reaction of PhO− with substituted phenyl dimethyl phosphorothioate esters. Combining the values of βNu and βlg gives βeq = 0.88; these parameters when considered together with the effective charge distribution in the TS, demonstrate that the TS for the symmetrical reaction (in which nucleophile = leaving group = 3-methyl-4-nitrophenoxide) has no significant phosphorylium ion character. The Leffler index points to a concerted reaction in which bond formation is slightly ahead of bond rupture in the TS. Data from the present study are compared with literature data for (thio)phosphoryl group transfer. We propose that, unless special structural and/or environmental features prevail, (thio)phosphoryl transfers between phenoxides are more likely to occur via a concerted mechanism. It is shown that the TS for the concerted transfer of (EtO)2PO between two PhO− moieties shows more pentacoordinate intermediate character than the symmetrical reaction of 1 due to differences in (i) basicity of PhO−versus 3-CH3,4-NO2PhO−, and (ii) abilities of O and S in the PX (X = O, S) moiety to stabilize the incoming negative charge.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.