Abstract

In the article, based on the analysis of the use of modern individual on-board electronics and electronic search and guidance systems, it is concluded that one of the promising directions for their further development is the search for methods of not only protection from the means of radio-electronic suppression, but also an active counteraction to these means, the so-called counter-radio electronic counteraction One of the most effective obstacles that can be created by radar detection systems by stations is the active barrier of individual enemy protection - this is a polarizing obstacle, so the issue of reducing the effectiveness of the polarizing effect on the system of automatic support for the direction of the on-board radar weapon control system is quite relevant today. In order to counteract the station's active interference in the conditions of its creation of a polarization obstacle, it is proposed to change the plane of polarization on the receiving side. As a result, a useful signal will be taken in polarization, which does not coincide with the polarization plane of the radiation signal. Failure to match polarization when receiving a reflected signal will not significantly affect the power of a useful signal. In order to implement the proposed method in the article, a mathematical model for evaluating the effectiveness of the counter-radio-electronic counteraction of the on-board station was proposed to obstruct the enemy's individual protection in the conditions of its creation of a polarization obstacle on a fixed plane of polarization, as well as features of the practical realization of such counteraction during air combat and restrictions on its creation. The mathematical model of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the counter-electronic counteraction to the aircraft station's active barriers in the conditions of its creation of a polarization obstacle on a fixed plane of polarization is developed, it will allow to formulate practical recommendations regarding the application of the developed method at different stages of air combat. KELP management in different ways, on the one hand, slightly reduces the effectiveness of the on-board management of weapons at different stages of flight, but on the other hand, the effectiveness of the airborne equipment of the airborne ejection of the enemy significantly decreases, which will increase the effectiveness of the use of weapons and the likelihood of damage to the enemy aircraft using the means of destruction, which today have a significant cost.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call