Abstract

Petroleum-rich basins at a mature stage of exploration and production offer many opportunities for large-scale Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) since oil and gas were demonstrably contained by low-permeability top-sealing rocks, such as shales. For CCS to work, there must be effectively no leakage from the injection site, so the nature of the top-seal is an important aspect for consideration when appraising prospective CCS opportunities. The Lower Cretaceous Rodby Shale and the Palaeocene Lista Shale have acted as seals to oil and gas accumulations (e.g., the Atlantic and Balmoral fields) and may now play a critical role in sealing the Acorn and East Mey subsurface carbon storage sites. The characteristics of these important shales have been little addressed in the hydrocarbon extraction phase, with an understandable focus on reservoir properties and their influence on resource recovery rates. Here, we assess the characteristics of the Rodby and Lista Shales using wireline logs, geomechanical tests, special core analysis (mercury intrusion) and mineralogical and petrographic techniques, with the aim of highlighting key properties that identify them as suitable top-seals. The two shales, defined using the relative gamma log values (or Vshale), have similar mean pore throat radius (approximately 18 nm), splitting tensile strength (approximately 2.5 MPa) and anisotropic values of splitting tensile strength, but they display significant differences in terms of wireline log character, porosity and mineralogy. The Lower Cretaceous Rodby Shale has a mean porosity of approximately 14 %, a mean permeability of 263 nD (2.58 × 10−19 m2), and is calcite rich and has clay minerals that are relatively rich in non-radioactive phases such as kaolinite. The Palaeocene Lista Shale has a mean porosity of approximately 16% a mean permeability of 225 nD (2.21 × 10−19 m2), and is calcite free, but contains abundant quartz silt and is dominated by smectite. The 2% difference in porosity does not seem to equate to a significant difference in permeability. Elastic properties derived from wireline log data show that Young’s modulus, material stiffness, is very low (5 GPa) for the most shale (clay mineral)-rich Rodby intervals, with Young’s modulus increasing as shale content decreases and as cementation (e.g., calcite) increases. Our work has shown that Young’s modulus, which can be used to inform the likeliness of tensile failure, may be predictable based on routine gamma, density and compressive sonic logs in the majority of wells where the less common shear logs were not collected. The predictability of Young’s modulus from routine well log data could form a valuable element of CCS-site top-seal appraisals. This study has shown that the Rodby and Lista Shales represent good top-seals to the Acorn and East Mey CCS sites and they can hold CO2 column heights of approximately 380 m. The calcite-rich Rodby Shale may be susceptible to localised carbonate dissolution and increasing porosity and permeability but decreasing tendency to develop fracture permeability in the presence of injected CO2, as brittle calcite dissolves. In contrast, the calcite-free, locally quartz-rich, Lista Shale will be geochemically inert to injected CO2 but retain its innate tendency to develop fracture permeability (where quartz rich) in the presence of injected CO2.

Highlights

  • Mudstones represent a crucial part of most Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sites given that they represent the most common top-seal of the structure

  • The Lower Cretaceous Rodby Shale at the Acorn CCS site has an overall porosity of Shales, show significant mineralogical heterogeneity; understanding how the system acts as whole approximately 14% and a suite of clay minerals dominated by smectite and including nonradioactive clay minerals such as kaolinite

  • The Palaeocene Lista Shale at the East Mey CCS site has a higher overall porosity of approximately 16% and a suite of clay minerals dominated by smectite with only minor quantities of non-radioactive clay minerals such as kaolinite

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mudstones represent a crucial part of most Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sites given that they represent the most common top-seal of the structure. Many CCS sites under consideration are either old oil and gas fields or deep saline aquifers [1]. Projects that plan for injection of CO2 into old oil and gas fields will fill the reservoirs and become trapped below the mudstone top-seal. There is demonstrably no long-term benefit in injecting CO2 into the subsurface if it is going to leak back to surface within a relatively short (10,000 yr) timescale. Harding, et al [3] showed that if 0.1% of the injected CO2 leaks each year, most of the injected CO2 will escape from the subsurface within approximately 2000 years, negating the benefits of long-term greenhouse gas disposal. Much the data lithostratigraphy and the geology the Basin Acornand andthe MeyNorth CO2 Storage

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call