Abstract

The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has demonstrated the capacity to perform a basic dosimetry audit on all radiotherapy clinics across Australia. During the ACDS’s three and a half year trial the majority of the audits were performed using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) mailed to facilities for exposure to a reference dose, and then returned to the ACDS for analysis. This technical note investigates the stability of the readout process under the large workload of the national dosimetry audit. The OSLD readout uncertainty contributes to the uncertainty of several terms of the dose calculation equation and is a major source of uncertainty in the audit. The standard deviation of four OSLD readouts was initially established at 0.6 %. Measurements over 13 audit batches—each batch containing 200−400 OSLDs—showed variability (0.5−0.9 %) in the readout standard deviation. These shifts have not yet necessitated a change to the audit scoring levels. However, a standard deviation in OSLD readouts greater than 0.9 % will change the audit scoring levels. We identified mechanical wear on the OSLD readout adapter as a cause of variability in readout uncertainty, however, we cannot rule out other causes. Additionally we observed large fluctuations in the distribution of element correction factors (ECF) for OSLD batches. We conclude that the variability in the width of the ECF distribution from one batch to another is not caused by variability in readout uncertainty, but rather by variations in the OSLD stock.

Highlights

  • Performing an independent and standardised audit is an internationally recognised way to minimise the risk of a dosimetric error in radiotherapy practice [1]

  • We identified mechanical wear on the optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) readout adapter as a cause of variability in readout uncertainty, we cannot rule out other causes

  • Combined relative standard uncertainty: 1.0 a Sub heading definitions: 100 uiA represents type A uncertainties expressed as a percentage, 100 uiB represents type B uncertainties expressed as a percentage b Uncertainties which are susceptible to drift in the reader stability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Performing an independent and standardised audit is an internationally recognised way to minimise the risk of a dosimetric error in radiotherapy practice [1]. The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) conducts a level one postal audit using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD, nanoDots (Landauer, Inc., Glenwood, IL), encased in Perspex blocks to determine the absorbed dose to water per monitor unit for MV photon and electron beams under reference conditions. The characterisation of OSLDs for use in clinical dosimetric measurements has been reported by Jursinic [4], by the International Atomic Energy Agency [5], and undertaken in the context of the ACDS audit by Dunn et al [6]. A key component of any audit is the pass/fail tolerance. The ACDS level one audit tolerance was defined using a rigorous uncertainty calculation [3]. ACDS relative standard uncertainty 100 uiA 100 uiB Quadratic summation: Combined relative standard uncertainty: 1.0 a Sub heading definitions: 100 uiA represents type A uncertainties expressed as a percentage, 100 uiB represents type B uncertainties expressed as a percentage b Uncertainties which are susceptible to drift in the reader stability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call