Abstract
This paper aims to present the main ideas of Foucault presented in his course taught in 1979 at the Collège de France, entitled The birth of biopolitics. In second place, two antagonistic analyzes of two renowned intellectuals will be examined, namely, The last lesson of Foucault by Geoffroy de Lagasnerie and Y at-il one sujet biopolitique by Frédéric Gros. From here, it will be necessary to understand a number of concepts, such as Foucault's rejection of the universals, the genealogy of schemes of veridiction, the logic of strategy and the diagnosis of politics, so that we can understand how, from a single work, it is possible to elaborate two very different analyzes, with such incompatible conclusions. Finally, we seek to elucidate how an understanding of the work from a broader reading, makes it possible to solve the main conflicts brought by the authors. However, we will show that Gros's analysis is more consistent with Foucault's thinking.
Highlights
This paper aims to present the main ideas of Foucault presented in his course taught in 1979 at the Collège de France, entitled The birth of biopolitics
It will be necessary to understand a number of concepts, such as Foucault's rejection of the universals, the genealogy of schemes of veridiction, the logic of strategy and the diagnosis of politics, so that we can understand how, from a single work, it is possible to elaborate two very different analyzes, with such incompatible conclusions
We seek to elucidate how an understanding of the work from a broader reading, makes it possible to solve the main conflicts brought by the authors
Summary
O curso ministrado por Michel Foucault no Collège de France em 1979 tem o intuito principal de nos fornecer uma análise acerca do fenômeno da biopol tica. A economia pol tica não se desenvolveu fora da razão de Estado visto que seu objetivo é o enriquecimento do mesmo. É no contexto de uma limitação interna ao poder do Estado que surge essa nova arte de governar intitulada de liberalismo. Nascido no século XVIII, o liberalismo tinha como objetivo não tanto assegurar o crescimento do Estado, mas limitar no interior do mesmo o exerc cio do poder de governar. Para termos liberdade de comércio é necessário medidas que evitarão os Liberalismo, neoliberalismo e a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais em Michel Foucault efeitos de hegemonia e monopol sticos. Na visão de Foucault, uma consequência do liberalismo é a extensão dos procedimentos de controle, pressão e coerção que constituem a contrapartida das liberdades. A ideia é ampliar as liberdades introduzindo mecanismos de controle e coerção
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
