Abstract

Entomopathogenic microbes such as Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV), Metarhizium anisopliae, and Pseudomonas fluorescens are biological agents used for the control of multiple arthropod pests. The objective of this study was to assess their effects on the biological parameters of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae, and its natural reduviid predator Rhynocoris kumarii (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under laboratory conditions. Results suggested that P. fluorescens reduced the food consumption index, relative growth rate, approximate digestibility, the efficiency of conversion of ingested food, and the efficiency of conversion of digested food of S. litura third instar larvae compared to prey infected with M. anisopliae and SpltNPV. Both SpltNPV and M. anisopliae caused similar mortality of S. litura life stages after 96 h of observation. To observe the effect of an infected prey diet on predator behavior, infected S. litura larvae were offered to the third, fourth, and fifth instar nymphs of R. kumarii, and their prey handling time, predation rate (number/day/predator), developmental period, and the survival rate was recorded. When the life stages of R. kumarii were offered entomopathogen-infected S. litura larvae, their predation rate was comparable to or higher than the untreated control. The juvenile predator, after feeding on P. fluorescens-infected S. litura larvae, had a significantly longer developmental period (2–4 days) compared to those fed on larvae infected with other microbial control agents. However, feeding on P. fluorescens alone did not affect the predator nymphal survival rate or the adult sex ratio. Although three entomopathogens had some degree of effect on the biological parameters of R. kumarii, the outcome of this study suggests that integration of reduviids with the tested entomopathogens are a compatible and potentially effective strategy for the management of S. litura populations. However promising, this combined strategy needs to be tested under field conditions to confirm the laboratory findings.

Highlights

  • The cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), known to attack over 120 plant species among vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals worldwide, is a serious pest of field crops inIndia [1]

  • In the no-choice test, R. kumarii after feeding on Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV)-infected S. litura larvae were deterred the most from eating at 24 (F = 249.5; df = 1, 18; p < 0.05), 48 (F = 250.0; df = 1, 18; p < 0.05), and 72 h (F = 247.0; df = 1, 18; p < 0.05) post-exposure compared to the other microbial treatments

  • We found that SpltNPV treatment highly deterred S. litura larvae initially, and subsequently reduced the food consumption index, approximate digestibility and absorption capacity, and affected the relative growth rate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), known to attack over 120 plant species among vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals worldwide, is a serious pest of field crops inIndia [1]. The cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), known to attack over 120 plant species among vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals worldwide, is a serious pest of field crops in. Due to the economic importance of many of its plant hosts, insecticide applications are considered the primary method for managing S. litura during the crop growing seasons [3].The indiscriminate and large-scale use of synthetic chemical pesticides to manage this pest has resulted in ecological imbalances, especially among natural enemies, as well as toxic effects on other living organisms, including humans [4]. In order to offer our growers alternatives to harmful synthetic chemical pesticides, it is imperative to explore eco-friendly (ecological + economical) pest management strategies utilizing biological control agents that could provide similar efficacy against this pest. Several researchers endorsed the utility of naturally occurring entomopathogens such as Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV), Metarizhium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin (=flavoviride) Gams and Rozsypal var. acridum, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Trevisan) Migula [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call