Abstract
The problems of interpretation of criminal law and administrative law institutes of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to cartels are considered.The definition of the effectiveness of the institution of active repentance is given as the ability of this institution to achieve the goals stipulated by law (in the aggregate or in a particular combination): 1) termination of the committed offense (crime) (“surrender”),2) assistance in investigating the relevant administrative offense (crime), 3) compensation for the harm caused by his offense (crime), 4) refusal to commit such offenses (crimes) in the future.The condition of the quadunity of these goals is investigated. It is noted that among the main factors reducing the effectiveness of administrative law and criminal law institutions of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to a cartel is the legal inconsistency of these institutions.Proposals are being made to amend par. 3 of the Notes to Art. 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Note 1 to Art. 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offenses iin order to bring together the relevant institutions of active repentance.The necessity of legislative consolidation of general procedural rules for the implementation of the person who participated in the conclusion of the cartel, the law granted him the right to active repentance is substantiated.
Highlights
Аннотация Рассматриваются проблемы толкования и применения уголовно-правового и административно-правового институтов деятельного раскаяния («программ смягчения») применительно к картелям
It is noted that among the main factors reducing the effectiveness of administrative law and criminal law institutions of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to a cartel is the legal inconsistency of these institutions
Существенно большее негативное влияние на достижение целей правосудия оказывает отсутствие юридически значимой связи между административноправовым и уголовно-правовым институтами деятельного раскаяния: физическое (должностное) лицо, освобожденное от административной ответственности по ст
Summary
Аннотация Рассматриваются проблемы толкования и применения уголовно-правового и административно-правового институтов деятельного раскаяния («программ смягчения») применительно к картелям. Отмечается, что к числу основных факторов снижения эффективности административно-правового и уголовно-правового институтов деятельного раскаяния («программ смягчения») применительно к картелю относится правовая несогласованность данных институтов. 14.32 КоАП РФ в целях сближения соответствующих институтов деятельного раскаяния.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.