Abstract

The purpose of the article to the study of the legal nature of the institution of issuing a warning by an antimonopoly authority to stop actions (inaction) that contain signs of violation of antimonopoly legislation, as well as procedural ways of its challenge. As a result of the analysis of the current legislation and law enforcement practice, the authors identified a number of problems arising in the process of judicial challenge of the warning, namely the length of the court procedure and the use of a formal approach in the consideration of this category of cases. The authors conclusions point to the expediency of enshrining the possibility of challenging a warning in an administrative procedure by expanding the powers of the collegial bodies of the FAS of Russia.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.