Abstract
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to predict the judgment result based on the facts of a case and becomes a promising application of artificial intelligence techniques in the legal field. In real-world scenarios, legal judgment usually consists of multiple subtasks, such as the decisions of applicable law articles, charges, fines, and the term of penalty. Moreover, there exist topological dependencies among these subtasks. While most existing works only focus on a specific subtask of judgment prediction and ignore the dependencies among subtasks, we formalize the dependencies among subtasks as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) and propose a topological multi-task learning framework, TopJudge, which incorporates multiple subtasks and DAG dependencies into judgment prediction. We conduct experiments on several real-world large-scale datasets of criminal cases in the civil law system. Experimental results show that our model achieves consistent and significant improvements over baselines on all judgment prediction tasks. The source code can be obtained from https://github.com/thunlp/TopJudge.
Highlights
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to predict the judgment results of legal cases according to the fact descriptions
We focus on the task of legal judgment prediction (LJP) and address multiple subtasks of judgment predication with a topological learning framework
We formalize the explicit dependencies over these subtasks in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) form, and propose a novel Multi-task learning (MTL) framework, TOPJUDGE, by integrating the DAG dependencies
Summary
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to predict the judgment results of legal cases according to the fact descriptions. It is a critical technique for the legal assistant system. LJP can provide low-cost but high-quality legal consulting services to the masses who are unfamiliar with legal terminology and the complex judgment procedures. It can serve as the handy reference for professionals (e.g., lawyers and judges) and improve their work efficiency. Law Article 264: [The crime of theft] Whoever steals a relatively large amount of public or private property or commits theft repeatedly fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have