Abstract
During the last presidential elections, the CPNT party found a particular echo. It is quite striking, since a part of the content of its programme concerns waterfowl hunting. The geographical approach makes of the obtained votes reveals some of its workings. As the expression of a geographic practice and as the assertion of the local identity resulting from the European construction, the vote for CPNT embodies a different vote, which depends more on its location and on the neighbouring solidarity than on its own network. The vote for CPNT is derived from both archaism and a certain modernity, and thus reflects some important political, social and identity stakes in our contemporary society.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
