Abstract

Increasing flood damage has led to a rising importance of land use in flood risk management policies, commonly referred to as the spatial turn in flood risk management. This includes policies aiming at making space for rivers, which, in practice, lead to an increasing demand for land. Although research has been conducted on the variety of policies, the resulting land use conflicts in flood-prone areas have not been paid much attention to. This paper therefore analyses the current land use and its changes in Alpine flood-prone areas in Austria. The results show that space for rivers has been decreasing due to human activities (e.g., river straightening and channel narrowing) since the middle of the 19th century, and settlements have been expanding into flood-prone areas. Furthermore, the share of valuable agricultural land (which is important for food production) located in flood hazard zones is higher in more mountainous areas. Given the limited space for permanent settlement in Alpine regions, these land use changes exert pressure on the availability of land suitable for flood risk management. Therefore, making space for rivers as part of flood risk management policies faces considerable restrictions in Alpine areas.

Highlights

  • Flooding is one of the most damaging natural hazards worldwide, with flood risks ever increasing [1]

  • The aim of this research was to examine the development of land use in flood-prone areas in an Austrian Alpine region and the resulting potential for land use conflicts

  • Research was guided by two research questions: (1) How did water bodies and settlements in flood-prone areas change between 1826–1857 and 2016 in Austrian Alpine regions? In the past, one important goal of flood prevention was making space for new settlements and intensifying agricultural production, which led to a decrease in rivers and streams by 40%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flooding is one of the most damaging natural hazards worldwide, with flood risks ever increasing [1]. This can, among other things, be linked to climate change, which is likely to further intensify flooding. Integrated flood risk management includes structural and non-structural measures, moving away from a solely engineering task to the inclusion of different disciplines [11,12]. With this paradigm shift, spatial planning has become a crucial part of flood risk management, and related policies are seen as an essential means to prevent flood damage [11]. According to van Ruiten and Hartmann [14], three aspects can be regarded as valid indicators for this spatial turn in flood risk management:

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call