Abstract

Despite an increasing number of people exposed to flood risks in Europe, flood risk perception remains low and effective flood risk management policies are rarely implemented. It becomes increasingly important to understand how local governments can design effective flood risk management policies to address flood risks. In this article, we study whether high flood exposure and flood risk perception correlate with the demand for a specific design of flood risk management policies. We take the ideal case of Switzerland and analyze flood risk management portfolios in 18 flood-prone municipalities along the Aare River. We introduce a novel combination of risk analysis and public policy data: we analyze correlations between recorded flood exposure data and survey data on flood risk perception and policy preferences for selected flood risk management measures. Our results indicate that local governments with high flood risk perception tend to prefer non-structural measures, such as spatial planning and ecological river restoration, to infrastructure measures. In contrast, flood exposure is neither linked to flood risk perception nor to policy preferences. We conclude that flood risk perception is key: it can decisively affect local governments’ preferences to implement specific diversified policy portfolios including more preventive or integrated flood risk management measures. These findings imply that local governments in flood-prone areas should invest in raising their population’s awareness capacity of flood risks and keep it high during periods without flooding.

Highlights

  • A growing number of extreme flood events in Europe poses an increasing risk to people, assets, and infrastructure (Kundzewicz et al 2018b)

  • We argue that effective flood risk management is possible when people’s exposure to floods, their perception of flood risks, and their policy preferences to address flood risks are congruent

  • Continuous urban developments in many flood-prone areas in Europe increase the number of people exposed to flood risks (Nicholls et al 2008; Kron et al 2019; Kundzewicz et al 2014), but their flood risk perception and policy preferences for measures to reduce these risks do not follow this trend

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A growing number of extreme flood events in Europe poses an increasing risk to people, assets, and infrastructure (Kundzewicz et al 2018b). More and more people are exposed to increasing flood risks (Nicholls et al 2008; Kundzewicz et al 2014), their perception of flood risks does not correspond with their actual exposure (Botzen et al 2009). The underestimation of flood risks reduces public support for policies and the willingness to take preventive measures (Botzen et al 2009). We argue that effective flood risk management is possible when people’s exposure to floods, their perception of flood risks, and their policy preferences to address flood risks are congruent. If flood exposure, flood risk perception, and policy preferences diverge, it is difficult to introduce effective flood risk management measures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.