Abstract
Some aspects of the french geographical thought during the 19th century. — The status and evolution of geography in France during the first half of the 19th century cannot be compared to its briliant burst of the 18th. Then it is not considered as a science but as an utilitarian knowledge : this is the reason why it does not appear in Ampere's or Comte's classifications. Many geographers, such as Balbi or Daunou, intend to protect the so said pure geography, from intercourses with geology or statistics when Cortambert attempts to associate it with the other sciences related to nature observation. Levasseur considers geography as a science of chain interrelations ; but it turns to an encyclopedic quest dominated by the determinist hypothesis which appears in Schrader and Dubois. Another disputed problem was related to the geographical divisions — natural or political — as they were discussed by Malte-Brun and Balbi. Regions were defined as hydrographie catchment areas when Elie de Beaumont stressed the importance of geological features. After 1870 the expressions of natural region and pays were favoured by Drapeyron, Berlioux, Levasseur and Auerbach and magnified by Lapparent — the main source and master of Vidal de La Blache — in spite of Dubois's opposition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
