Abstract
Marianne Doury: Classification of arguments on ordinary discourses. The representations ordinary speakers have about argumentative procedures is necessary to the scientific analysis of argumentation itself. Actually, this ordinary knowledge of argumentation is of great influence on the strategies speakers use in specific contexts. In particular, their perception of the social legitimacy and value of an argument is crucial for their choices when criticising the antagonist discourse. The question arises of the homology of scientific and non-scientific categorisations of arguments and of their respective use in argumentative interactions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
