Abstract
<p>Celem artykułu jest ustalenie miejsca nazw kulturowych w typologii urbanonimów i opis ewolucji zarówno terminu, jak i jego zakresu. Spostrzeżenia tu poczynione są oparte na analizach urbanonimów prowadzonych od lat 60. XX wieku po czasy współczesne. Autorka w kolejnych częściach tekstu omawia różne spotykane w literaturze przedmiotu definicje nazw kulturowych oraz ich miejsce w typologiach nazewnictwa miejskiego, cechy charakterystyczne tej grupy onimów (ich produktywność, motywy nominacyjne, tworzywo genetyczne), wreszcie przedstawia kwestie dyskusyjne dotyczące klasyfikowania mian z pogranicza typu nazw kulturowych i innych typów semantyczno-motywacyjnych (kultowych, topograficznych, pamiątkowych, metaforycznych, posesywnych i relacyjnych). W zakończeniu podejmuje próbę wyznaczenia zakresu terminu <em>nazwy kulturowe w odniesieniu do nazewnictwa miejskiego.</em></p>
Highlights
A group of cultural names was noticed and distinguished by Taszycki. Before he proposed his own classification of place names, he first provided a critical overview of the existing names
Two issues deserve to be emphasised: first, cultural names have been claimed historical; second, Buczyński separated the names derived from building names and from other cultural facilities – these were not included by him among the cultural ones, nor did he place them in the topographic group
Górnowicz and Handke divided them into separate classes; Kopertowska placed them among the cultural names, while in the studies of the nomenclature of Rzeszów they were placed within the range of characterizing names
Summary
A group of cultural names was noticed and distinguished by Taszycki. before he proposed his own classification of place names, he first provided a critical overview of the existing names. He noted that some researchers regarded names motivated by workmanship (e.g. Kościelec, Gródek, Karczmiska) as topographical (e.g. Wojciechowski) He stated that this action was in a sense justified, because: “Works of craftsmanship in a certain area, made and clearly indicated (gród [castle], kościół [church], karczma [tavern]), made their mark on it, changing its appearance. The researcher proposed the term cultural names for all names related to what a person can create, i.e. the so-called material cultural heritage, as well as for names related to what a person believes in, how they organize their lives, how they manage the land These names have never been the names of other designations (especially of persons), but from the beginning of their existence they have meant “a piece of land”; they have been the names “connected with certain devices, institutions and products of material, social and spiritual culture” These names have never been the names of other designations (especially of persons), but from the beginning of their existence they have meant “a piece of land”; they have been the names “connected with certain devices, institutions and products of material, social and spiritual culture” (Taszycki, 1946, p. 23)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio FF – Philologiae
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
