Abstract

Since the 2008 financial crisis, the attempts to use Karl Polanyi's framework to make sense of current developments have multiplied, producing a noticeable and lively debate. This debate centres on the notion of double movement put forward by the Hungarian thinker in his masterpiece – The Great Transformation. The paper is a contribution to this debate. The first part addresses a series of questions that make the interpretations of the double movement advanced so far not very compelling. To this end, a close reading of Polanyi's text, with the aim of dismantling and rearticulating its analytical structure, is carried out. The upshot is a dynamic and multistage picture of the double process as a recurrent and vortex-like attempt to progressively commodify natural and social resources against growing opposition. The second part employs this revised reading of the double movement to explain the collapse of the postwar consensus politics, the success of the neoliberal counterrevolution and the development of the knowledge economy. The claim put forward here is that, in addition to sustained efforts to deepen previous forms of commodification (land, labour and money), we are witnessing a fullblown attempt to turn knowledge into a new fictitious commodity. Building on the idea of digital Taylorism, the paper tries to show that information and computer technologies are being used to standardise and routinise a growing number of intellectual, professional and managerial activities which were able to escape previous attempts in this direction. Once again, at the forefront of this process there are powerful state actors, who are using New Public Management policies strategically to: support the enclosure of intangible cultural resources through the creation of intellectual property rights regimes, and undermine the counter-reaction of negatively affected societal actors by rising the collective action problems they face.

Highlights

  • The aim of this paper is to re-evaluate the heuristic role of Polanyi's double movement by suggesting an alternative reading that could answer several criticisms expressed in the past about it

  • This reading of the double movement can give us a better insight into both the nature of the current crisis and its failure to unravel the neoliberal consensus.1. According to this reading of the double movement, since the Speenhamland measures introduced in 1795 Britain, faulty welfarist solutions have had the effect of undermining the political force of countermovements calling for protective measures, while helping pro-market coalitions to periodically regenerate themselves

  • This means that the future resolution of the current crisis is likely to restart a new cycle in what looks uncannily like modernity's 'Groundhog Day'

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to re-evaluate the heuristic role of Polanyi's double movement by suggesting an alternative reading that could answer several criticisms expressed in the past about it. Employing it instrumentally as an accounting device only would affect its social relevance, producing unwanted fluctuations in the money supply that will disrupt other aspects of the real economy Polanyi uses those arguments to: (i) deny the naturalness of markets, (ii) underscore the conceptual differences between ancient and modern markets, and (iii) castigate political attempts to engender self-regulating markets through state action.. The 'double movement' thesis represents an enduring aspect of Polanyi's account of the rise and fall of earlier attempts to realise a self-regulating market economy Obviously, this is the feature of his work that has attracted the critical attention of successive generations of social and political theorists who have shared his concerns. Beyond the remit of this paper is Polanyi's vision of socialism, which is tightly connected to his social epistemology

The attempt to turn land into a fictitious commodity
The attempt to turn labour into a fictitious commodity
Financial drives to commodify money
The information society and digital Taylorism
Enclosing the common of the mind and commodifying knowledge
Conclusion: neoliberal change in a Polanyian perspective

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.