Abstract

AbstractThis article sets forth a view about how epistemic justification figures in the ongoing justification of memory belief, a view that I callmoderate justificational preservationism(MJP). MJP presupposes a nontraditional notion ofmemorial justificationaccording to which what makes one's present belief that pprima faciejustified is that which provided one withprima faciejustification to believe that p originally (or some portion thereof). The article offers support for MJP by examining a series of cases that involve forgetting, and in doing so, criticizes views of Jennifer Lackey, David Owens, Michael Huemer, and George Pappas.

Full Text

Published Version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.