Abstract

The economic paradigms of Ludwig von Mises on the one hand and of John Maynard Keynes on the other have been correctly recognized as antithetical at the theoretical level, and as antagonistic with respect to their practical and public policy implications. Characteristically they have also been vindicated by opposing sides of the political spectrum. Nevertheless the respective views of these authors with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability exhibit a closer conceptual affinity than has been acknowledged in the literature. In particular it is argued that in some relevant respects Ludwig von Mises’ interpretation of the concept of probability exhibits a closer affinity with the interpretation of probability developed by his opponent John Maynard Keynes than with the views on probability espoused by his brother Richard von Mises. Nevertheless there also exist significant differences between the views of Ludwig von Mises and those of John Maynard Keynes with respect to probability. One of these is highlighted more particularly: where John Maynard Keynes advocated a monist view of probability, Ludwig von Mises embraced a dualist view of probability, according to which the concept of probability has two different meanings each of which is valid in a particular area or context. It is concluded that both John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises presented highly nuanced views with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability.
 JEL codes: B00; B40; B49; B53; C00.
 Key words: General Methodology; Austrian Methodology; Keynesian Methodology; Quantitative and Qualitative Probability Concepts: Meaning and Interpretation; Frequency Interpretation; Logical Interpretation; John Maynard Keynes; Ludwig von Mises; Richard von Mises.
 Resumen: Los paradigmas económicos de Ludwig von Mises por una parte, y de John Maynard Keynes por otra, han sido correctamente reconocidos como contradictorias a nivel teórico, y como antagonistas, con respecto a sus implicaciones políticas prácticas y públicas. Aún así, las respectivas visiones de estos autores con respecto al significado e interpretación de la probabilidad, muestra una afinidad conceptual más estrecha que los que se ha reconocido en la literatura. Se ha argumentado especialmente que en algunos aspectos importantes, la interpretación de Ludwig von Mises del concepto de probabilidad, muestra una más estrecha afinidad con la interpretación de probabilidad desarrollada por su oponente John Maynard Keynes, que con las maneras de ver la probabilidad respaldadas por su hermano Richard von Mises. Sin embargo, también existen grandes diferencias entre los puntos de vista de Ludwig von Mises y aquellos de John Maynard Keynes con respecto a la probabilidad. Uno de ellos destaca principalmente: cuando John Maynard Keynes aboga por un punto de vista monista de la probabilidad, Ludwig von Mises defiende un punto de vista dualista de la probabilidad, de acuerdo con el cual el concepto de probabilidad recibe dos significados diferentes, y en donde cada uno de ellos es válido en un área o contexto en particular. Se concluye que tanto John Maynard Keynes como Ludwig von Mises presentan puntos de vista claramente diferenciados con respecto al significado e interpretación de la probabilidad.
 Códigos JEL: B00; B40; B49; B53; C00.
 Palabras clave: Metodología General; Metodología austríaca; Metodología Keynesiana; Conceptos de probabilidad cuantitativos y cualitativos: Significado e Interpretación; Interpretación frecuencialista; Interpretación lógica; John Maynard Keynes; Ludwig von Mises; Richard von Mises.

Highlights

  • The complex issues relating to the interpretation and meaning of different concepts of probability and the legitimate scope of their useful application in the social sciences and in economics belong to the more controversial topics within the sub-field of economic methodology

  • There exist significant differences between the views of Ludwig von Mises and those of John Maynard Keynes with respect to probability. One of these is highlighted more : where John Maynard Keynes advocated a monist view of probability, Ludwig von Mises embraced a dualist view of probability, according to which the concept of probability has two different meanings each of which is valid in a particular area or context

  • Ludwig von Mises’ views about probability have been no less influential within the context of the Austrian School and even beyond. In this respect some commentators have claimed that Ludwig von Mises basically embraced the frequency interpretation of probability of his brother Richard von Mises1, suggesting that Ludwig von Mises’ views on probability are no less antagonistic to those of John Maynard Keynes than his views on economic theory and public policy

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The complex issues relating to the interpretation and meaning of different concepts of probability and the legitimate scope of their useful application in the social sciences and in economics belong to the more controversial topics within the sub-field of economic methodology. Ludwig von Mises’ views about probability have been no less influential within the context of the Austrian School and even beyond In this respect some commentators have claimed that Ludwig von Mises basically embraced the frequency interpretation of probability of his brother Richard von Mises, suggesting that Ludwig von Mises’ views on probability are no less antagonistic to those of John Maynard Keynes than his views on economic theory and public policy. This latter view will here be challenged. Even if Ludwig von Mises «views on probability exhibit a closer conceptual affinity with Keynes» philosophy of probability than with the frequency interpretation espoused by his brother Richard von Mises, an important difference between the views of Ludwig von Mises and those of John Maynard Keynes in this respect will be acknowledged

THE SUMMA DIVISIO IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PROBABILITY
RICHARD VON MISES’ OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO PROBABILITY
JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES’ EPISTEMIC APPROACH TO PROBABILITY
MORE ABOUT LUDWIG VON MISES
Findings
VIII CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call