Is there a role for lung or bronchial biopsies for the diagnosis of mycobacterial pulmonary disease in patients with bronchiectasis?

Abstract

BackgroundWorkup of bronchiectasis patients mandates microbiological characterization often being sought via Bronchoscopy. However, whether to perform bronchial or lung biopsies, is unknown, especially for the diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease. We aimed to assess the current practice and yield of the different bronchoscopic procedures in this setting. MethodsData from an adult cohort with bronchiectasis referred for bronchoscopy for microbiologic sampling was reviewed, including demographics, etiology, imaging and results of the different bronchoscopic procedures performed. Results127 subjects were analyzed (mean age 61, 56% female). BAL culture was positive in 44%. Frequent pathogens were Hemophilus Influenza (20%), pseudomonas aeruginosa (8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (7%). NTM and tuberculosis were found in 6% and 1.5% respectively. BAL cytology was sent in 125 procedures, EBB was performed in 51 patients (40%) and TBLB in 38 patients (30%). BAL cytology and both EBB and TBB (including tissue cultures) had no benefit over BAL with respect to microbiological diagnosis, including identification of mycobacterial disease. ConclusionsIn adult subjects with Non-CF bronchiectasis requiring bronchoscopy for microbiological characterization, BAL cytology and lung tissue biopsies were frequently performed but were of minimal additional benefit over BAL culture (including for mycobacterial pulmonary disease), and are most likely futile.