IS RAWLS A KANTIAN?

Abstract

Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyVolume 66, Issue 1-2 p. 48-77 Article IS RAWLS A KANTIAN?† Arnold I. Davidson, Arnold I. Davidson The University of Chicago, Chicago, IllinoisSearch for more papers by this author Arnold I. Davidson, Arnold I. Davidson The University of Chicago, Chicago, IllinoisSearch for more papers by this author First published: January-April 1985 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1985.tb00241.xCitations: 1 †Earlier versions of this paper were read at Harvard University, Dartmouth College, and Stanford University, and I am grateful to audiences on those occasions for their comments and criticisms. I have had helpful discussions about this paper with more people than I can now remember, but I would like to single out Tom Beauchamp, Michael Bratman, Daniel Brudney, John Carriero, Bernard Gert, David Gauthier, Robert Nozick, Martha Nussbaum, Hilary Putnam, Thomas Pogge, Andrews Reath, Susan Wolf, and especially Stanley Cavell and John Rawls. Finally, the comments of the editors of the PPQ on the penultimate version led to many improvements. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume66, Issue1-2January-April 1985Pages 48-77 RelatedInformation