Abstract
This paper analyzes the role of researchers from the social sciences and humanities as interlocutors of issues that are publicly problematized so as to enter the legislative agenda of governments. The theoretical framework is based on three axes: the question of politicized and mobile social science, the public communication of science and the public problems approach. A case study was carried out: the activity of the National Campaign for the Right to Legal, Safe and Free Abortion in Argentina and the parliamentary treatment of the draft Law of Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in the Chamber of Deputies. The parliamentary debate was developed in 15 public debate sessions. We investigated the arguments in favor of the project. Specifically, the focus is placed on presentations made from the social sciences and humanities. Three questions guided our research: what role did academics from the social sciences and humanities play in the debate? How many of them also made, during the debate period, some outreach activity besides their participation in the plenary? and, those who carried out dissemination efforts, did they have the support of an intermediary organization?
Highlights
Who carried out dissemination efforts, did they have the support of an intermediary c c organization?
We investigated the arguments in favor of the project
Esta complejización de los discursos t í científicos y disciplinares, volvió aún más intrincado el análisis desde un f enfoque de modelos de comunicación científica, al mismo tiempo que dei c mostró la importancia de cómo se define una problemática al convertirse a en asunto público, en este caso, la problemática del aborto
Summary
Doctora en Ciencias Sociales por la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
