Interpreting the biological effects of protons as a function of physical quantity: linear energy transfer or microdosimetric lineal energy spectrum?

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The choice of appropriate physical quantities to characterize the biological effects of ionizing radiation has evolved over time coupled with advances in scientific understanding. The basic hypothesis in radiation dosimetry is that the energy deposited by ionizing radiation initiates all the consequences of exposure in a biological sample (e.g., DNA damage, reproductive cell death). Physical quantities defined to characterize energy deposition have included dose, a measure of the mean energy imparted per unit mass of the target, and linear energy transfer (LET), a measure of the mean energy deposition per unit distance that charged particles traverse in a medium. The primary advantage of using the “dose and LET” physical system is its relative simplicity, especially for presenting and recording results. Inclusion of additional information such as the energy spectrum of charged particles renders this approach adequate to describe the biological effects of large dose levels from homogeneous sources. The primary disadvantage of this system is that it does not provide a unique description of the stochastic nature of radiation interactions. We and others have used dose-averaged LET (LETd) as a correlative physical quantity to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton beams. This approach is based on established experimental findings that proton RBE increases with LETd. However, this approach might not be applicable to intensity-modulated proton therapy or other applications in which the proton energy spectrum is highly heterogeneous. In the current study, we irradiated cancer cells with scanning proton beams with identical LETd (3.4 keV/µm) but arising from two different proton energy/LET spectra (a narrow spectrum in group 1 and a widespread heterogeneous spectrum in group 2). Clonogenic survival after irradiation revealed significant differences in RBE at any cell surviving fraction: e.g., at a surviving fraction of 0.1, the RBE was 0.97 ± 0.03 in group 1 and 1.16 ± 0.04 in group 2 (p≤0.01), validating our hypothesis that LETd alone may not adequately indicate proton RBE. Further analysis showed that microdosimetric spectrum (the probability density function of the stochastic physical quantity lineal energy y) was helpful for interpreting observed differences in biological effects. However, more accurate use of microdosimetric spectrum to quantify RBE requires a cell line–specific mechanistic model.