Abstract

In situ stabilization technologies based on lime-derived materials are extensively used for remediating Cd-contaminated paddy soils. However, the environmental impacts and carbon budget associated with these technologies throughout the paddy soil remediation life cycle are gaining increasing attention. Herein, through paddy field trials, two representative lime-derived materials, quicklime and calcium–silicon composite (Ca/Si), are evaluated for their remediation effectiveness and environmental sustainability in the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils. The results demonstrate that both quicklime and Ca/Si can reduce Cd bioavailability and enable the safe use of rice grain. Nevertheless, the life cycle assessment score of the quicklime case is 4.4 times that of the Ca/Si case, indicating that the quicklime case has a greater negative impact on the environment. Furthermore, the net ecosystem carbon budget analysis reveals that both lime-derived materials exhibit outward carbon emissions throughout their life cycle, in which the carbon emission of the quicklime case (−20.2 t CO2-eq/ha) is 20 times that of the Ca/Si case (−1 t CO2-eq/ha). Moreover, the implementation of carbon capture technology results in the Ca/Si case achieving a positive carbon budget and contributing to a carbon neutrality plan. Conversely, the quicklime case falls short, affording only a 24.8 % reduction in carbon emissions. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the environmental sustainability of different lime-derived materials for paddy soil remediation and carbon mitigation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call