Abstract

In times of increasing pressures on water resources, the integrated management of the resource is a central policy objective. While there exists encompassing research about the concept of integrated water resources management (IWRM), much remains to be studied regarding the integration of water-related policies. Water resources management profits when policy actors coordinate their demands and actions across policy sectors, territorial entities, and decision-making levels within a water basin. However, actors are bound by the policy framework, which organizes water resources management in defined sectors and, over time, develop into independent and specialized policy pillars. A growing number of policies increases the need to integrate those policies over time following the institutional resources regime (IRR) framework. However, an increasing number of policies also proves challenging in establishing an integrated, coherent regime compliant with IWRM. In this study, we analyze flood risk management policies and find an almost exponential increase in policies over time, while flood risks and damage have not decreased in parallel. We address this empirical puzzle with an in-depth analysis of the design of Swiss flood risk management policies over time. To this end, we survey the opinion of 146 flood experts on the importance of ten policy design indicators in three flood-prone regions in Switzerland. Flood risk management experts attribute particular importance to policy designs characterized by integration, a sufficient budget for policy implementation, and coercive instruments and sanctions. We then compare survey results to the ways in which Swiss policies have been designed in legislation across policy sectors related to flood risk management over the last 169 years. We find that policy designs follow a national policy style. Placing these results in local contexts, we explain why the design of policies represents both a challenge and opportunity for policy-makers involved in flood risk management.

Highlights

  • Integrated water resources management (IWRM) has evolved as one of the guiding principles of water management today

  • Understanding the policy framework and the ways in which public policies evolve over time constitutes a prerequisite for successful and adaptive water governance, which has become increasingly important in times of climate change and related flood risks [70]

  • Water management rests on integrated water resources management (IWRM) as a guiding principle in many countries, including Switzerland [73]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Integrated water resources management (IWRM) has evolved as one of the guiding principles of water management today. In order to promote the sustainable management of the resource water, the concept of IWRM puts forward that diverse water users need to coordinate horizontally across sectors and vertically across scales (from the local to the international scale). In fulfilling its goal to integrate various demands and activities, IWRM is bound by the policy framework that regulates uses and users of a resource [1]. Policy frameworks tend to develop into specialized sectors over time, whereby each sector consists of its own set of public policies regulating specific territories and levels. Coordinating the diverse water interests across sectors, levels, and territories successfully is contingent upon the integration of these specialized sectoral public policies into a coherent regime, but such orchestration proves a major challenge. This article focuses on the integration of policies towards IWRM

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call