Abstract

Historically, behaviour of zoo housed species during hours of limited staff and visitor presence has been poorly studied, largely due to the lack of appropriate technology. Advances in digital monitoring equipment and facility design by European elephant holders has given researchers scope to accurately evaluate behaviour for this species over 24 hrs. Various behavioural indicators of welfare have now been identified for zoo housed elephants; however the relationship between resting behaviour and welfare experience has been an area highlighted to require additional research. Lying rest is a potential positive welfare indicator for this species, with studies suggesting that engagement in lying rest can be used to monitor both psychological and physiological wellbeing. Throughout this work we aim to give insights into the behaviour of individual Asian elephants at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo, specifically between the hours of 16:00 and 10:00. In addition to presenting the activity budgets of our study individuals during these times, we explore individual engagement in resting behaviour. Furthermore, we evaluate the social associations of our study group during rest. We provide evidence that unrelated individuals can form strong associations with conspecifics when resting and show that life history is a factor to consider when evaluating social compatibility between group members. Finally, we demonstrate the positive role that calves and juvenile individuals can play in facilitating meaningful associations between group members during rest. Our study highlights the importance of evaluating behaviour during understudied time periods in order to obtain a holistic view of individual welfare, further emphasising the importance of adopting an evidence-based approach to management for this species in zoos.

Highlights

  • Modern zoos are striving to adopt a more holistic approach to assessing animal welfare [1], moving far beyond the requirements outlined in the “five freedoms” framework [2]

  • Over the last two decades, criticisms have been raised in relation to the welfare experienced by elephants in European and North American zoos [4,5]

  • Williams et al [7] summarised that 37 unique indicators of welfare are used for African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants, which include documenting activity levels, recording engagement in positive social interactions, monitoring body condition scores, observing foot health and quantifying concentrations of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern zoos are striving to adopt a more holistic approach to assessing animal welfare [1], moving far beyond the requirements outlined in the “five freedoms” framework [2]. Zoos aim to design habitats and management strategies which enable individuals to thrive in a zoo housed-environment [3]. A number of multi-institutional studies have been conducted, aiming to identify the relationship between zoo environmental factors and individual wellbeing [6]. Edwards et al [9] outlined that housing factors, such as free access to unique environments and management strategies including enrichment diversity, could influence the number of clinical heath events experienced by zoo housed elephants. Multi-institutional studies have been conducted to understand how zoo environmental factors influence engagement in stereotypic behaviours, with Greco et al [10] highlighting that variables such as isolated housing, experience of inter zoo transfers and time spent in mixed sex social groups influence engagement in stereotypy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call