Abstract

One of the challenges to conditioning models of fear acquisition is to explain how different individuals can experience similar learning events and only some of them subsequently develop fear. Understanding factors moderating the impact of learning events on fear acquisition is key to understanding the etiology and prevention of fear in childhood. This study investigates these moderators in the context of vicarious (observational) learning. Two experiments tested predictions that the acquisition or inhibition of fear via vicarious learning is driven by associative learning mechanisms similar to direct conditioning. In Experiment 1, 3 groups of children aged 7 to 9 years received 1 of 3 inhibitive information interventions—psychoeducation, factual information, or no information (control)—prior to taking part in a vicarious fear learning procedure. In Experiment 2, 3 groups of children aged 7 to 10 years received 1 of 3 observational learning interventions—positive modeling (immunization), observational familiarity (latent inhibition), or no prevention (control)—before vicarious fear learning. Results indicated that observationally delivered manipulations inhibited vicarious fear learning, while preventions presented via written information did not. These findings confirm that vicarious learning shares some of the characteristics of direct conditioning and can explain why not all individuals will develop fear following a vicarious learning event. They also suggest that the modality of inhibitive learning is important and should match the fear learning pathway for increased chances of inhibition. Finally, the results demonstrate that positive modeling is likely to be a particularly effective method for preventing fear-related observational learning in children.

Highlights

  • One of the challenges to conditioning models of fear acquisition is to explain how different individuals can experience similar learning events and only some of them subsequently develop fear

  • The central aim of the studies was to investigate whether reducing threat expectancies for conditioned stimulus (CS) would, as predicted by contemporary conditioning models, inhibit vicarious fear learning

  • Experiment 2 showed that positive modeling can “immunize” children against future vicarious fear learning, confirming predictions that vicarious fear learning shares this characteristic of conditioning models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the challenges to conditioning models of fear acquisition is to explain how different individuals can experience similar learning events and only some of them subsequently develop fear. Results indicated that observationally delivered manipulations inhibited vicarious fear learning, while preventions presented via written information did not These findings confirm that vicarious learning shares some of the characteristics of direct conditioning and can explain why not all individuals will develop fear following a vicarious learning event. General Scientific Summary The studies demonstrate that positive modeling and prior exposure to a stimulus are effective methods to prevent vicarious fear learning in 7 to 10-year-olds. Early-onset anxiety disorders, like phobia, are associated with some of the longest delays before treatment (Wang et al, 2005), which may be the result of lower mental health literacy during early stages of life, and possibly the ability of individuals with phobias to avoid their fear-provoking stimulus. Critical to this aim is research with nonclinical, typically developing children to determine the mechanisms driving how and when fears do, or do not, develop

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call