Abstract

Recent research has indicated that vicarious learning can lead to increases in children’s fear beliefs and avoidance preferences for stimuli and that these fear responses can subsequently be reversed using positive modeling (counterconditioning). The current study investigated children’s vicariously acquired avoidance behavior, physiological responses (heart rate), and attentional bias for stimuli and whether these could also be reduced via counterconditioning. Ninety-six (49 boys, 47 girls) 7- to 11-year-olds received vicarious fear learning for novel stimuli and were then randomly assigned to a counterconditioning, extinction, or control group. Fear beliefs and avoidance preferences were measured pre- and post-learning, whereas avoidance behavior, heart rate, and attentional bias were all measured post-learning. Control group children showed increases in fear beliefs and avoidance preferences for animals seen in vicarious fear learning trials. In addition, significantly greater avoidance behavior, heart rate responding, and attentional bias were observed for these animals compared to a control animal. In contrast, vicariously acquired avoidance preferences of children in the counterconditioning group were significantly reduced post-positive modeling, and these children also did not show the heightened heart rate responding to fear-paired animals. Children in the extinction group demonstrated comparable responses to the control group; thus the extinction procedure showed no effect on any fear measures. The findings suggest that counterconditioning with positive modelling can be used as an effective early intervention to reduce the behavioral and physiological effects of vicarious fear learning in childhood.

Highlights

  • Recent research has indicated that vicarious learning can lead to increases in children’s fear beliefs and avoidance preferences for stimuli and that these fear responses can subsequently be reversed using positive modeling

  • A three-way 2 × 3 × 3 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted on avoidance preferences indicated that the main effect of time was significant, F(1.55, 186) = 5.34, p = .011, η2p = .05, 95% confidence interval (CI) [.003, .11], but there was no significant main effect of group, F(2, 93) = 0.77, p = .47, η2p = .02, 95% CI [0, .08], or pairing type, F(1, 93) = 2.77, p = .099, η2p = .03, 95% CI [.0, .12]

  • The important Pairing Type × Time interaction was significant, F(2, 186) = 12.22, p < .001, η2p = .12, 95% CI [0.04, 0.20], indicating a significant change in avoidance preferences over time that was different for fear-paired and unpaired animals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent research has indicated that vicarious learning can lead to increases in children’s fear beliefs and avoidance preferences for stimuli and that these fear responses can subsequently be reversed using positive modeling (counterconditioning). A substantial body of prospective, experimental research has indicated that vicarious learning can lead to increases in children’s fear cognitions and behavioral avoidance of animals (e.g., Askew, Dunne, Özdil, Reynolds, & Field, 2013; Askew & Field, 2007; Askew, Kessock-Philip, & Field, 2008; Dubi, Rapee, Emerton, & Schniering, 2008; Dunne & Askew, 2013; Egliston & Rapee, 2007; Gerull & Rapee, 2002), and more recently physiological responses and attentional bias toward threat (Reynolds, Field, & Askew, 2014). Identifying which characteristics of associative learning are shared by vicarious learning could potentially influence the development of more appropriate interventions and the prevention of fear

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call