Abstract

This study investigates the influence of different turbulent inflow conditions on the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of turbulent combustion problems. Four turbulent inflow conditions are studied, including two Synthetic turbulence methods (White Noise and Random Spot), and two Precursor simulation methods (Library and Library-Rescale). The simulation results are compared with experimental measurements. While the White Noise method yields a longer flame with poor agreement against experiments, the Random Spot method has good predictions initially but overpredicts turbulent fluctuations downstream. The results obtained by the Library and Library-Rescale methods are similar, and the discrepancies mainly lie in the region around the centerline. By rescaling the turbulent inlet library to match the experimental profiles, the Library Rescale method improves the prediction of turbulence fluctuations near the nozzle. The present study shows the pronounced sensitivity of LES accuracy in turbulent jet flames to the choice of turbulent inflow conditions.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.