Abstract

The main purpose of the present research is to determine whethet judges at the Family Court violate the best interests of the child by ruling restricted freedom in cases where assisted freedom should be tuled, and whether the principle of proportionality between the minor's actions and personal circumstances. This research was conducted in the Family Courts of the Superior Court of Justice of North Lima, which have experienced legal action for adolescents in conflict with criminal law. Its purpose is the creation of mechanisms and/or basic guiding procedures towards the application of socio-educational measures, especially assisted freedom, as well as to bridge the existing gaps when executing the imposed measures. Such measutes must fit within the existing guaranteesin all process, as well as the fair application of the principle of proportionality between the act committed and the measure applied.

Highlights

  • Sin embargo, ante un hecho delictivo cometido por más leve que sea, optamos por una solución facilista, que viene hacer el internamiento del adolescente en un centro de rehabilitación con la máxima restricción de sus derechos olvidando la finalidad de la medida impuesta al menor, quien a su vez goza de derechos específicos y protección especial porla simple condición de ser menor de edad

  • The main purpose of the present research is to determine whethet judges at the Family Court violate the best interests of the child by ruling restricted freedom in cases where assisted freedom should be tuled, and whether the principle of proportionality between the minor's actions and personal circumstances

  • Its purpose is the creation of mechanisms and/or basic guiding procedures towards the application of socio-educational measures, especially assisted freedom, as well as to bridge the existing gaps when executing the imposed measures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ante un hecho delictivo cometido por más leve que sea, optamos por una solución facilista, que viene hacer el internamiento del adolescente en un centro de rehabilitación con la máxima restricción de sus derechos olvidando la finalidad de la medida impuesta al menor, quien a su vez goza de derechos específicos y protección especial porla simple condición de ser menor de edad. Com RESUMEN.La presente investigación centra sus objetivos en determinar si los Magistrados de la Especialidad de Familia violentan el Interés Superior del Niñoal fijar la medida de libertad restringida en casos donde correspondería imponerla libertad asistida y si se ha respetadoel principio de proporcionalidad entre el hecho cometido y las condiciones personales del menor.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call