Abstract

The emerging technological demands for high‐efficiency solar cells and flexible optoelectronic devices have stimulated research on transparent conducting oxide (TCO) electrodes. High‐mobility TCOs are needed to achieve high conductivity with improved visible and near‐infrared transparency; however, the fabrication of TCO films on heat‐sensitive layers or substrates is constrained by the trade‐off between fabrication temperatures and TCO properties. Historically, Sn‐doped indium oxide and amorphous In–Zn–O have been used as standard TCOs to achieve high mobility using low fabrication temperatures. However, two polycrystalline In2O3 films with significantly higher mobilities have recently been reported: i) polycrystalline (poly‐) In2O3 films doped with metal (Ti, Zr, Mo, or W) impurities instead of Sn exhibit mobilities greater than ≈80 cm2 V−1 s−1 even when grown at low temperatures and ii) solid‐phase crystallized (spc‐) H‐doped In2O3 (In2O3:H) and In2O3:Ce,H films exhibit mobilities greater than 100 cm2 V−1 s−1 when processed at low temperatures of 150–200 °C. Here, poly‐In2O3, In2O3:W, and In2O3:Ce films and spc‐In2O3:H, In2O3:W,H, and In2O3:Ce,H films are fabricated. Comparative studies of these films reveal the effect of the i) metal dopant species; ii) metal and hydrogen codoping; and iii) solid‐phase crystallization process on the resultant transport properties.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call