Abstract

AbstractIn system dynamics, we care about mental models, because it is what we attempt to describe, understand, and improve using qualitative maps and computer simulation models. But if we are developing maps and models from a group of individuals, can we still call what we are trying to study a mental model? The main difference between individual and group‐level phenomena is that in a group setting interaction and communication among individuals shape what is represented in maps and models. This paper attempts to clarify the object of our group‐level modeling by surveying existing literature searching for concepts similar to “mental model” at the group level. The survey leads to an insight that what we attempt to represent with our maps and models varies widely by our selection of modeling methods, and how we define our object will draw attention to a different set of theoretical literature. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.