Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessIn from the Periphery: American Women in Science, 1830-1880Sally Gregory KohlstedtSally Gregory Kohlstedt Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 4, Number 1Autumn, 1978Women, Science, and Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493570 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1978 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Mary Orr ‘In from the Periphery’? Re-framing the Reach of the Nineteenth-Century French Literary-Scientific Imagination, Dix-Neuf 25, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2022): 280–299.https://doi.org/10.1080/14787318.2021.2017571Javier Gómez-Ferri, Gregorio González-Alcaide, Ramón LLopis-Goig Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception, Journal of Informetrics 13, no.44 (Nov 2019): 100980.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100980Kara W. Swanson Rubbing Elbows and Blowing Smoke: Gender, Class, and Science in the Nineteenth-Century Patent Office, Isis 108, no.11 (Mar 2017): 40–61.https://doi.org/10.1086/691396 Bibliography, (Oct 2015): 566–665.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072218.biblioScott A. Elias A Brief History of the Changing Occupations and Demographics of Coleopterists from the 18th Through the 20th Century, Journal of the History of Biology 47, no.22 (Aug 2013): 213–242.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9365-9Margaret W. Rossiter The More You Look, the More You Find: Archives of Recent American Women Scientists, Centaurus 54, no.44 (Oct 2012): 288–291.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2012.00277.xGeorgina H. Endfield, Carol Morris ‘Well weather is not a girl thing is it?’ Contemporary amateur meteorology, gender relations and the shaping of domestic masculinity, Social & Cultural Geography 13, no.33 (May 2012): 233–253.https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.677470William P. Palmer Forgotten Women in Science Education, (Jan 2011): 167–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-719-6_9Mary R.S. Creese, Thomas M. Creese British women who contributed to research in the geological sciences in the nineteenth century, Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 117, no.11 (Jan 2006): 53–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7878(06)80030-1 Margaret C. Jacob Dorothée Sturkenboom A Women’s Scientific Society in the West: The Late Eighteenth‐Century Assimilation of Science Jacob and Sturkenboom, Isis 94, no.22 (Jul 2015): 217–252.https://doi.org/10.1086/379385Pamela M. Henson Invading Arcadia: Women Scientists in the Field in Latin America, 1900-1950, The Americas 58, no.44 (Dec 2015): 577–600.https://doi.org/10.1353/tam.2002.0045Lois Arnold Becoming A Geologist: Florence Bascom In Wisconsin, 1874-1887, Earth Sciences History 18, no.22 (Jan 1999): 159–179.https://doi.org/10.17704/eshi.18.2.m5500526x7331430Mary R. S. Creese, Thomas M. Creese British women who contributed to research in the geological sciences in the nineteenth century, The British Journal for the History of Science 27, no.11 (Jan 2009): 23–54.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400031654Carole B. Shmurak, Bonnie S. Handler Lydia Shattuck: “A Streak of the Modern”, Teaching Education 3, no.22 (Jan 1991): 127–131.https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621910030214 Sally Gregory Kohlstedt Parlors, Primers, and Public Schooling: Education for Science in Nineteenth-Century America, Isis 81, no.33 (Oct 2015): 424–445.https://doi.org/10.1086/355454Emanuel D. Rudolph WOMEN WHO STUDIED PLANTS IN THE PRE‐TWENTIETH CENTURY UNITED STATES AND CANADA, TAXON 39, no.22 (Jun 2019): 151–205.https://doi.org/10.2307/1223016Marianne G. Ainley Unequal Colleagues: The Entrance of Women into the Professions, The Journal of Higher Education 60, no.11 (Nov 2016): 116–118.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1989.11778827Marjorie R. Theobald Women's studies in colonial Victoria, Melbourne Studies in Education 31, no.11 (Jan 1989): 14–33.https://doi.org/10.1080/17508488909556228Beatrice Scheer Smith JANE COLDEN (1724-1766) AND HER BOTANIC MANUSCRIPT, American Journal of Botany 75, no.77 (Jul 1988): 1090–1096.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08817.xBARBARA IMBER AND NANCY TUANA Feminist Perspectives on Science, Hypatia 3, no.11 (Dec 2008): 139–155.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00060.xClara M. Chu, Bertrum H. MacDonald Women in Canadian Science and Technology before World War I: their Publication Record, Scientia Canadensis 12, no.22 (Jul 2009): 75–96.https://doi.org/10.7202/800270arDorinda Outram The most difficult career: Women's history in science, International Journal of Science Education 9, no.33 (May 1987): 409–416.https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090319Katherine D. Neustadt The nature of woman and the development of American folklore, Women's Studies International Forum 9, no.33 (Jan 1986): 227–234.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(86)90057-9Emanuel D. Rudolph WOMEN IN NINETEENTH CENTURY AMERICAN BOTANY; A GENERALLY UNRECOGNIZED CONSTITUENCY, American Journal of Botany 69, no.88 (Sep 1982): 1346–1355.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13382.xMargaret Alic The history of women in science: A women's studies course, Women's Studies International Forum 5, no.11 (Jan 1982): 75–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(82)90066-8Anne Fausto-Sterling Women and science, Women's Studies International Quarterly 4, no.11 (Jan 1981): 41–50.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(81)96343-0D. E. Allen The Women Members of the Botanical Society of London, 1836–1856, The British Journal for the History of Science 13, no.33 (Jan 2009): 240–254.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400018057D. J. Kevles, J. L. Sturchio, P. T. Carroll The Sciences in America, Circa 1880, Science 209, no.44524452 (Jul 1980): 27–32.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4452.27

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call