Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessFeminism and ScienceEvelyn Fox KellerEvelyn Fox Keller Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 7, Number 3Spring, 1982Feminist Theory Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493901 Views: 194Total views on this site Citations: 141Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nathaniel Otjen Habituated Knowledges: The Entanglements of Science, Species, and Selfhood, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 69 (Oct 2022): 1–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2126188Aishwarya Ramachandran, Isobel C. Mouat, Gunilla Öberg Incorporating equity, diversity, and inclusion in science: Lessons learned from an undergraduate seminar, Science Education 69 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21768Ana Aliende Urtasun, Julian J. Garrido The Narrative of a Line of Research from a Feminist Perspective: Fiber Optic Sensors and Actor–Network Theory (ANT), Social Sciences 11, no.88 (Jul 2022): 323.https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080323Joane Nagel, Trevor Scott Lies Re-gendering Climate Change: Men and Masculinity in Climate Research, Policy, and Practice, Frontiers in Climate 4 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.856869Emma Frances Bloomfield, Sara C. VanderHaagen Where Women Scientists Belong: Placing Feminist Memory in Biography Collections for Children, Women's Studies in Communication 45, no.22 (Jul 2021): 187–209.https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.1941464Nicky Hudson The missed disease? Endometriosis as an example of ‘undone science’, Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 14 (Mar 2022): 20–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.003April Mitchell, Kimberly H. Lott, Colby Tofel-Grehl Cookie-Jar Alarms: An Analysis of First-Grade Students’ Gendered Conceptions of Engineers following a Programming Design Task, Education Sciences 12, no.22 (Feb 2022): 110.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020110Andrea Vera-Gajardo Belonging and Masculinities: Proposal of a Conceptual Framework to Study the Reasons behind the Gender Gap in Engineering, Sustainability 13, no.2020 (Oct 2021): 11157.https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011157Katina Sawyer When Objectivity Is Out of Reach: Learnings from Conducting Research with Commercially Sexually Exploited Women, Academy of Management Perspectives 35, no.33 (Aug 2021): 367–383.https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0088Cara E. Jones Queering gendered disabilities, Journal of Lesbian Studies 25, no.33 (Jun 2020): 195–211.https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2020.1778852Meghan A. Duffy, Carlos García-Robledo, Swanne P. Gordon, Nkrumah A. Grant, Delbert A. Green II, Ambika Kamath, Rachel M. Penczykowski, María Rebolleda-Gómez, Nina Wale, and Luis Zaman Model Systems in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior: A Call for Diversity in Our Model Systems and Discipline, The American Naturalist 198, no.11 (May 2021): 53–68.https://doi.org/10.1086/714574Travis Brisini Mapping the “naturecultural turn” in performance studies, Text and Performance Quarterly 41, no.1-21-2 (May 2021): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2021.1916582Jessica C Lai The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon, Social & Legal Studies 30, no.22 (Apr 2020): 203–229.https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920916237Joan S. Rabin How Diversity in Nature Impacts Political Psychology, (Oct 2020): 97–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38270-4_4Anna Saave Teaching Feminist Economics. Conceptual Notes and Practical Advice for Teaching a Subject in the Making, (Nov 2020): 77–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30920-6_6Lisa M. Osbeck Values and Persons: The Persistent Problem of Values in Science and Psychology, (Sep 2021): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_87-1Bob Pease From Ecomasculinity to Profeminist Environmentalism: Recreating Men’s Relationship with Nature, (Aug 2021): 537–557.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54486-7_26Paul M. Pulé, Martin Hultman, Angelica Wågström Discussions at the Table, (Aug 2021): 17–101.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54486-7_2Maryanne L. Fisher, Justin R. Garcia, Rebecca L. Burch Evolutionary Psychology, (Mar 2020): 378–392.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131797.032Laura McMahon “The Separation That is Not a Separation But a Form of Union”: Merleau-Ponty and Feminist Object Relations Theory in Dialogue, Human Studies 43, no.11 (Dec 2019): 37–60.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09528-0Joanna Radin Alternative Facts and States of Fear: Reality and STS in an Age of Climate Fictions, Minerva 57, no.44 (Apr 2019): 411–431.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09374-5Lydia Namatende-Sakwa Networked texts: discourse, power and gender neutrality in Ugandan physics textbooks, Gender and Education 31, no.33 (Nov 2018): 362–376.https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1543858Bob Pease Recreating Men’s Relationship with Nature: Toward a Profeminist Environmentalism, Men and Masculinities 22, no.11 (Mar 2019): 113–123.https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18805566Nora Ruck, Alexandra Rutherford, Markus Brunner, Katharina Hametner Scientists as (Not) Knowing Subjects: Unpacking Standpoint Theory and Epistemological Ignorance from a Psychological Perspective, (Aug 2019): 127–148.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25308-0_6Wendy Luttrell, Emily Clark Replaying Our Process: Video/Art Making and Research, Qualitative Inquiry 24, no.1010 (Sep 2018): 775–785.https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418800106Meredith Nash ‘Let’s work on your weaknesses’: Australian CrossFit coaching, masculinity and neoliberal framings of ‘health’ and ‘fitness’, Sport in Society 21, no.99 (Nov 2017): 1432–1453.https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1390565 From Ape Motherhood to Tough Love, (Aug 2018): 33–59.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-002 On the Surface of Skin and Earth, (Aug 2018): 61–79.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-003 Forced Copulation for Conservation, (Aug 2018): 83–104.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-004 Finding a Living, (Aug 2018): 105–128.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-005 Arrested Autonomy, (Aug 2018): 131–156.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-006 Hospice for a Dying Species, (Aug 2018): 157–175.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-007 Introduction, (Aug 2018): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-001 Conclusion:, (Aug 2018): 177–188.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-008 Notes, (Aug 2018): 189–223.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-009 References, (Aug 2018): 225–254.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371946-010Lina M. Martínez G. CONSTRUCCIÓN DE LA VERDAD CON PERSPECTIVA DE GÉNERO: UN MARCO TEÓRICO FEMINISTA Y NARRATIVO PARA EL ESCLARECIMIENTO DE LAS LÓGICAS DE LA GUERRA EN COLOMBIA, Análisis Político 31, no.9393 (May 2018): 79–92.https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v31n93.75618Jeff Kochan Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, (Dec 2017).https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0129Rachel E. Scherr, Amy D. Robertson Unveiling Privilege to Broaden Participation, The Physics Teacher 55, no.77 (Oct 2017): 394–397.https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5003737Veronica Sanz No Way Out of the Binary: A Critical History of the Scientific Production of Sex, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43, no.11 (Aug 2017): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1086/692517Heather Anne Swanson Methods for Multispecies Anthropology: Thinking with Salmon Otoliths and Scales, Social Analysis 61, no.22 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2017.610206May-Britt Öhman TechnoVisions of a Sámi Cyborg: Reclaiming Sámi Body-, Land-, and Waterscapes After a Century of Colonial Exploitations in Sábme, (Jan 2016): 63–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15272-1_5Deborah K. Heikes Representation and Racism, (Apr 2016): 45–102.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5_2Hélène Charron, Isabelle Auclair Démarches méthodologiques et perspectives féministes, Recherches féministes 29, no.11 (Jan 2016): 1.https://doi.org/10.7202/1036666arBeth A. Bee, Jennifer Rice, Amy Trauger A Feminist Approach to Climate Change Governance: Everyday and Intimate Politics, Geography Compass 9, no.66 (Jun 2015): 339–350.https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12218Darlene A. Osowiec Philosophy of Science and the Emerging Paradigm: Implications for Hypnosis, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 56, no.33 (Jan 2014): 216–233.https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2013.858613Malin Ah-King Queering animal sexual behavior in biology textbooks, Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics 1, no.22 (Sep 2013): 46–89.https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21dChristine Brooks, Kendra Ford, Anne Huffman Feminist and Cultural Contributions to Transpersonal Psychology, (Aug 2013): 612–625.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118591277.ch34J. Kasi Jackson Doomsday Ecology and Empathy for Nature, Science Communication 33, no.44 (Dec 2011): 533–555.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011417893Kristina Karlsson Green, Josefin A. Madjidian Active males, reactive females: stereotypic sex roles in sexual conflict research?, Animal Behaviour 81, no.55 (May 2011): 901–907.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.033Phyllis Rooney The Marginalization of Feminist Epistemology and What That Reveals About Epistemology ‘Proper’, (Mar 2011): 3–24.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_1Allison J. Gonsalves Gender and Doctoral Physics Education: Are We Asking the Right Questions?, (Feb 2011): 117–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_7Aaronette M. White, William Dotson It Takes a Village to Raise a Researcher: Narrative Interviewing as Intervention, Reconciliation, and Growth, Journal of Black Psychology 36, no.11 (Jan 2009): 75–97.https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798408329945João Arriscado Nunes Rescuing Epistemology*, RCCS Annual Review , no.11 (Dec 2009).https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.165 Paige West Tourism as Science and Science as Tourism: Environment, Society, Self, and Other in Papua New Guinea West, Current Anthropology 49, no.44 (Jul 2015): 597–626.https://doi.org/10.1086/586737NATALIE SAPPLETON, HAIFA TAKRURI-RIZK The Gender Subtext of Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) Organizations: A Review and Critique, Women's Studies 37, no.33 (Apr 2008): 284–316.https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870801917242João Arriscado Nunes O resgate da epistemologia1, Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais , no.8080 (Mar 2008): 45–70.https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.693Aurolyn Luykx, Okhee Lee, Margarette Mahotiere, Benjamin Lester, Juliet Hart, Rachael Deaktor Cultural and Home Language Influences on Children's Responses to Science Assessments, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 109, no.44 (Feb 2022): 897–926.https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900403Diane Hope Chapter Five: The Rhetoric of the Autobiographical Voice in Women's Environmental Narratives: Lois Gibbs' Love Canal: My Story and Sandra Steingraber's Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment, The Environmental Communication Yearbook 1, no.11 (Jan 2004): 77–97.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567362ecy0101_5Julie Mills, Mary Ayre Implementing an Inclusive Curriculum for Women in Engineering Education, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 129, no.44 (Oct 2003): 203–210.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2003)129:4(203)Sarah-Marie Belcastro, Jean Marie Moran Interpretations of Feminist Philosophy of Science by Feminist Physical Scientists, NWSA Journal 15, no.11 (Apr 2003): 20–33.https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2003.15.1.20 Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for Psychologists., American Psychologist 58, no.55 (Jan 2003): 377–402.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.377Lisa Cosgrove Feminism, Postmodernism, and Psychological Research, Hypatia 18, no.33 (Mar 2020): 85–112.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00823.x Introduction, (Jan 2003): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-001 The Politics of Culture I, (Jan 2003): 11–34.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-002 The Politics of Culture II, (Jan 2003): 35–69.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-003 Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies I, (Jan 2003): 73–107.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-004 Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies II, (Jan 2003): 108–139.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-005 A Rose by Any Other Name? The Wide World and Many Modes of Cultural Studies, (Jan 2003): 140–169.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-006 Conjunctural Knowledge I, (Jan 2003): 173–191.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-007 Conjunctural Knowledge II, (Jan 2003): 192–205.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-008 The Near Future of the Long Term, (Jan 2003): 206–214.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-009 Notes, (Jan 2003): 215–236.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-010 Works Cited, (Jan 2003): 237–266.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385127-012Ilana Löwy La science ne doit plus se décliner au masculin. Entretien avec Evelyn Fox Keller, Mouvements no17, no.44 (Nov 2001): 117–124.https://doi.org/10.3917/mouv.017.0117Marjean D. Purinton Mary Shelley's science fiction short stories and the legacy of Wollstonecraft's feminism, Women's Studies 30, no.22 (Apr 2001): 147–174.https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2001.9979369Lisa Weasel Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System, Hypatia 16, no.11 (Mar 2020): 27–44.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb01047.xHeather Anne De Lair, Eric Erwin Working Perspectives within Feminism and Early Childhood Education, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 1, no.22 (Jun 2000): 153–170.https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2000.1.2.4Margaret Eisenhart Boundaries and selves in the making of ‘science’, Research in Science Education 30, no.11 (Mar 2000): 43–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461652Sue V. Rosser Controversies in Breast Cancer Research, (Jan 2000): 245–270.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-03779-4_9Okhee Lee Equity Implications Based on the Conceptions of Science Achievement in Major Reform Documents, Review of Educational Research 69, no.11 (Jun 2016): 83–115.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001083RACHEL L. EINWOHNER GENDER, CLASS, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT OUTCOMES, Gender & Society 13, no.11 (Feb 1999): 56–76.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013001004Joey Sprague, Margaret Greer Standpoints and the Discourse on Abortion, Women & Politics 19, no.33 (Jun 1998): 49–80.https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v19n03_03E.Anne Kerr Toward a feminist natural science, Women's Studies International Forum 21, no.11 (Jan 1998): 95–109.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00081-2Joan Engebretson, Diane Wind Wardell Perimenopausal Women's Alienation, Journal of Holistic Nursing 15, no.33 (Jun 2016): 254–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/089801019701500306Sue V. Rosser Possible Implications of Feminist Theories for the Study of Evolution, (Jan 1997): 21–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_2Elizabeth M. Brumfiel The Quality of Tribute Cloth: The Place of Evidence in Archaeological Argument, American Antiquity 61, no.33 (Jan 2017): 453–462.https://doi.org/10.2307/281834Margaret Eisenhart, Elizabeth Finkel, Scott F. Marion Creating the Conditions for Scientific Literacy: A Re-Examination, American Educational Research Journal 33, no.22 (Jun 2016): 261–295.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002261Brian Pronger Rendering the Body: The Implicit Lessons of Gross Anatomy, Quest 47, no.44 (Nov 1995): 427–446.https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1995.10484168GEOFFREY GORHAM The Concept of Truth in Feminist Sciences, Hypatia 10, no.33 (Jan 2009): 99–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00739.xAlan Soble In Defense of Bacon, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25, no.22 (Aug 2016): 192–215.https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319502500203Margaret Olivia Little Seeing and Caring: The Role of Affect in Feminist Moral Epistemology, Hypatia 10, no.33 (Mar 2020): 117–137.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00740.xKathryn Paige Factors perceived to have enabled 25 women to develop expertise to teach primary science, Research in Science Education 24, no.11 (Dec 1994): 246–252.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356350Robin Burgess-Limerick, Bruce Abernethy, Brigid Limerick Identification of Underlying Assumptions is an Integral Part of Research: An Example from Motor Control, Theory & Psychology 4, no.11 (Aug 2016): 139–146.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394041007Peggy Tripp-Knowles Androcentric bias in science?, Women's Studies International Forum 17, no.11 (Jan 1994): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(94)90002-7Nancy W. Veeder Women's decision making, Women's Studies International Forum 17, no.44 (Jan 1994): 391–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(05)80045-7SHIRLEY HARKESS, CAROL A.B. WARREN The Social Relations of Intensive Interviewing, Sociological Methods & Research 21, no.33 (Feb 1993): 317–339.https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124193021003002Joan Wolffensperger ‘Science Is Truly a Male World.’ The Interconnectedness of Knowledge, Gender and Power within University Education, Gender and Education 5, no.11 (Jul 2006): 37–54.https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025930050103Sue V. Rosser Are there feminist methodologies appropriate for the natural sciences and do they make a difference?, Women's Studies International Forum 15, no.5-65-6 (Sep 1992): 535–550.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(92)90057-3Marsha Hanen, Jane Kelley Gender and Archaeological Knowledge, (Jan 1992): 195–225.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1826-2_8Margaret Purser “Several paradise ladies are visiting in town”: Gender strategies in the early industrial west, Historical Archaeology 25, no.44 (Sep 2016): 6–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373520Dorothy Kleffel An Ecofeminist Analysis of Nursing Knowledge, Nursing Forum 26, no.44 (Oct 1991): 5–18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1991.tb00890.x Bibliography, Current Sociology 39, no.22 (Sep 1991): 83–115.https://doi.org/10.1177/001139291039002009NONA Y. GLAZER “BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE”:, Gender & Society 5, no.33 (Sep 1991): 351–372.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124391005003006Brenda J. L. Bredemeier, Gloria S. Desertrain, Leslee A. Fisher, Debby Getty, Nancy E. Slocum, Dawn E. Stephens, Jaimie M. Warren Epistemological perspectives among women who participate in physical activity, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 3, no.11 (Mar 1991): 87–107.https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209108406436Sue V. Rosser Eco-feminism, Women's Studies International Forum 14, no.33 (Jan 1991): 143–151.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(91)90106-RChris Shilling Social Space, Gender Inequalities and Educational Differentiation, British Journal of Sociology of Education 12, no.11 (Jul 2006): 23–44.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569910120102Margaret A. Crouch Feminist Philosophy and the Genetic Fallacy, Hypatia 6, no.22 (Mar 2020): 104–117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb01395.xPamela S. Perlich The Relation of Science to the Feminist Project, Review of Radical Political Economics 22, no.2-32-3 (Aug 2016): 113–138.https://doi.org/10.1177/048661349002200206Beth B. Hess Beyond dichotomy: Drawing distinctions and embracing differences, Sociological Forum 5, no.11 (Mar 1990): 75–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115138Lila Abu‐Lughod Can There Be A Feminist Ethnography?, Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory 5, no.11 (Jan 1990): 7–27.https://doi.org/10.1080/07407709008571138Letitia Anne Peplau, Eva Conrad Beyond Nonsexist Research: The Perils of Feminist Methods in Psychology, Psychology of Women Quarterly 13, no.44 (Nov 2016): 379–400.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01009.xDavid John Bateson‡, Sharon Parsons‐Chatman Sex‐related differences in science achievement: a possible testing artefact, International Journal of Science Education 11, no.44 (Oct 1989): 371–385.https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110402Barbara Adam Feminist Social Theory Needs Time. Reflections on the Relation between Feminist Thought, Social Theory and Time as an Important Parameter in Social Analysis, The Sociological Review 37, no.33 (Aug 2011): 458–473.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1989.tb00039.xJoey Sprague, Mary K. Zimmerman Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology, The American Sociologist 20, no.11 (Mar 1989): 71–86.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697788Michelle Fine, Susan Merle Gordon Feminist Transformations of/Despite Psychology, (Jan 1989): 146–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3588-0_8Donna Bassin Woman’s Shifting Sense of Self, (Jan 1989): 189–202.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5631-8_16Zuleyma Tang Halpin Scientific objectivity and the concept of “the other”, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 285–294.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80006-8Sue V. Rosser Teaching techniques to attract women to science: Applications of feminist theories and methodologies, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 363–377.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80013-5Alison Wylie, Kathleen Okruhlik, Leslie Thielen-Wilson, Sandra Morton Feminist critiques of science, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80014-7Sue V. Rosser Re-visioning Clinical Research: Gender and the Ethics of Experimental Design, Hypatia 4, no.22 (Mar 2020): 125–139.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00577.xBARBARA IMBER AND NANCY TUANA Feminist Perspectives on Science, Hypatia 3, no.11 (Dec 2008): 139–155.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00060.xSusan A. McDaniel, Helene Cummins, Rachelle Sender Beauchamp Mothers of invention? Meshing the roles of inventor, mother, and worker, Women's Studies International Forum 11, no.11 (Jan 1988): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90002-7Mary Gergen Chapter Nine Loss of Control Among the Aging?: A Critical Reconstruction, (Jan 1988): 261–290.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60983-8Mary Tiles A Science of Mars or of Venus?, Philosophy 62, no.241241 (Jan 2009): 293–306.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100038808Dorinda Outram The most difficult career: Women's history in science, International Journal of Science Education 9, no.33 (May 1987): 409–416.https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090319Sandra Harding The Garden in the machine: Gender relations, the Processes of Science, and Feminist Epistemological Strategies, (Jan 1987): 125–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_7Sandra Harding The Politics of the Natural: The Case of Sex Differences, (Jan 1987): 185–203.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3725-3_10Lynda I.A. Birke, Gail Vines A sporting chance: The anatomy of destiny?, Women's Studies International Forum 10, no.44 (Jan 1987): 337–347.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(87)90051-3Howard S. Kurtzman Deconstructionist psychology and human liberation: A reply to Philip Wexler, New Ideas in Psychology 5, no.11 (Jan 1987): 77–94.https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(87)90045-6Sue V. Rosser Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough?, Hypatia 2, no.33 (Mar 2020): 5–17.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01338.xI. D. John “The scientist” as role model for “the psychologist”, Australian Psychologist 21, no.22 (Sep 2007): 219–240.https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068608256183Evelyn Fox Keller Making Gender Visible in the Pursuit of Nature’s Secrets, (Jan 1986): 67–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7_5Patricia A. Kaufert Menstruation and menstrual change: Women in midlife, Health Care for Women International 7, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1986): 63–76.https://doi.org/10.1080/07399338609515724Anthony Chase Lawyers and Popular Culture: A Review of Mass Media Portrayals of American Attorneys, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 11, no.22 (Nov 2018): 280–300.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1986.tb00242.xSusan Krieger Beyond ?subjectivity?: The use of the self in social science, Qualitative Sociology 8, no.44 (Jan 1985): 309–324.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988842ALEXIS J. WALKER, LINDA THOMPSON Feminism and Family Studies, Journal of Family Issues 5, no.44 (Jun 2016): 545–570.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251384005004010Judith A. Levy Gender Bias as a Threat to Construct Validity in Research Design, Humanity & Society 8, no.44 (Jan 2018): 478–488.https://doi.org/10.1177/016059768400800412Evelyn Fox Keller Science and Power for What?, (Jan 1984): 261–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6340-5_12David M. Klein, Joan A. Jurich Metatheory and Family Studies, (): 31–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_2M.-A. Dobres Engendering prehistoric technology? All it takes is practice, (): 266–275.https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.1999.787344

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call