Abstract
The results of a generalized analysis of the assessment of the development of socio-economic systemsof the region, carried out according to the documents of strategies and development plans in comparisonwith the actual achievements of the development strategies of the Dnipropetrovsk region. The analysis wascarried out according to statistical reporting and analytical reports on the results of the implementation ofregional development projects and analytical notes of experts. The system failure of these projects is shown.Among the factors influencing the state, the lack of timely, high-quality and full assessment of the results ofthe development processes was identified. The analysis used expert and statistical information indicators ofperformance, their total and index comparison, estimates of the dynamics of changes and integral estimates.and index comparisons, the dynamics of their changes without analyzing the causes of negative deviationsare used. It is determined that there is no single information and analytical basis for the methodologicalassessment of results. Based on the processing of scientific, legislative sources and practical information onthe selection and justification of development strategies and plans, the results of a generalized analysis ofthe state of socio-economic development and the implementation of project activities in the Dnipropetrovskregion are presented. It is noted that the methodological tools of analysis use only expert and statisticalindicators, their total and index comparisons and the dynamics of changes without analyzing the causes ofnegative deviations. There is no single information base for the assessment methodology. The necessity ofcombining the implementation of one-time and episodic measures to assess the state, quality and effectivenessof development processes with the systematic implementation of analytical measures is shown. Attention isdrawn to the need to increase the competencies of persons carrying out analysis and assessment of the state ofdevelopment processes and formulate conclusions on the development of territorial communities. It is provedthat qualitative assessment should be considered as the main tool to increase managerial impact on the impactof development processes by creating a single integrated information-analytical assessment system usingmathematical models, computer technologies and their software.
Highlights
Наведено результати узагальненого аналізу оцінювання розвитку соціально-економічних систем регіону, здійсненого за документами стратегій і планів розвитку в порівнянні з фактичними досягненнями стратегій розвитку Дніпропетровської області
The analysis was carried out according to statistical reporting and analytical reports on the results of the implementation of regional development projects and analytical notes of experts
It is noted that the methodological tools of analysis use only expert and statistical indicators, their total and index comparisons and the dynamics of changes without analyzing the causes of negative deviations
Summary
Наведено результати узагальненого аналізу оцінювання розвитку соціально-економічних систем регіону, здійсненого за документами стратегій і планів розвитку в порівнянні з фактичними досягненнями стратегій розвитку Дніпропетровської області. Аналіз показників і індикаторів досягнення цілей розвитку України на період 2004–2015 рр. На сучасному етапі оцінювання здійснюється шляхом підготовки аналітичних звітів з виконання проектів розвитку і аналітичних записок про загальний стан досягнення цілей розвитку, але система показників розвитку, що була прийнята при розробці стратегічних планів, аналізується поверхово.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have